Wednesday, 22 February 2017 04:24:17 (AST)

National·Business

At committee meeting, BLA members reject new election rules

BLA members say:

• Raising nomination, voting right period to 2 years is ‘outrageous’
• ‘Raise the bar’ on who can be a director
• New criteria for director nomination biased towards academic qualification

Members of the BLA at the meeting in Kingstown on Thursday.

Members of the BLA at the meeting in Kingstown on Thursday.

Shareholders of the Building & Loan Association (BLA) on Thursday rejected the new rule that only persons who are members for two years or more can nominate or vote at the general meeting on Aug. 29.

One woman described the proposal as “outrageous” even as she called on members to “lift the bar” for who can be a director.

“If they (FSA) say two years for the person to be on the board, we can live with that,” she said.

The objections came as BLA members discussed the implications of proposed changes to the rules governing the election of the association’s directors.

The Financial Services Authority (FSA), which took over management and control of the BLA in February, has proposed new rules to govern the election of a board on Aug. 29.

Among other things, a person now has to be a member of the BLA for two years before they can nominate or vote — four times longer than was previously the case.

If a nominee is also a borrower, s/he must not be in arrears and candidates must be Vincentians effectively residing in SVG.

They must be a graduated or licensed professional in areas relevant to finance and/or management, including certified public accountant, attorney, financial expert, chartered surveyor, real estate agent, or similar.

Candidates can also be businesspersons (owner or management capacity); or be an academic at college with relevant expertise relating to business, banking, accounting, finance, or a similar field.

Thursday’s meeting was convened by the BLA Shareholders Committee, which has been interfacing with the FSA to restructure the financially troubled 72-year-old building society.

The meeting came just over a week after the FSA met with BLA members to update them on work done over the past four months.

‘biased towards person with academic qualifications’

Jerry George, PRO of the BLA Shareholders Committee (Internet photo)

Jerry George, PRO of the BLA Shareholders Committee (Internet photo)

Jerry George, public relations officer of the Shareholders Committee, said the rules are giving a “direction, … or … a mandate” regarding how the director are elected and what their qualifications must be.

“And what is apparent, it is very much biased toward persons with academic qualifications,” he said.

An insurance executive noted that at the meeting with the FSA the previous week, there were “sentiments supporting the election of ordinary members, just as in other organisations.

“In support of that, it is quite obvious that the former board was packed with very skilled and talented and qualified persons, and so it stands to reason that a wide cross-section of representations would have prevented many of the things which happened,” he said of the previous board of the BLA.

The FSA took over management and control of the BLA after a run on the institution triggered by a newspaper article in January that raised questions about the BLA’s management and financial health.

Following the letter, persons were able to withdraw their savings without giving or observing the notice period as mandated by the BLA’s own rules.

The insurance executive further said that at the FSA’s meeting with BLA members the previous week, he got the impression that the FSA “realised that the sentiments of the members would be in favour of a wide cross-section of the membership” being on the board of directors.

But George wanted to know if the BLA could be dictated to with respect to how it selects it board.

“That’s basically one of the fundamental issues that we need to deal with this evening,” the public relations professional said.

Qualification versus credibility

An accountant, who said he is not a member of the BLA but has deposits there and has clients overseas who have asked him to attend the meeting, said he could understand the need for board members to have some level of financial literacy.

“That is acceptable,” he said, but added that according to the Corporations Act, the only requirement to be a director is that you have to be at the age of majority.

He further said that it is reasonable to expect directors to understand the type of business, adding that that would suggest certain qualification.

The accountant, however, said that by qualification, he was speaking primarily about experience.

Accountant Sylvia Sutherland. (IWN file photo)

Accountant Sylvia Sutherland. (IWN file photo)

A female member from the floor observed that former directors of the BLA were qualified.

“The big set of qualifications did not work. What happen to people with credibility? We need to balance it,” she said, adding that the requirements laid out by the FSA are “too stringent”.

“I want to say I condemn this sort of qualification,” she said.

And, Sylvia Sutherland, an accountant and member of the Shareholders Committee, said she does not think that people would accept nominations “if they feel inadequate to be there”, adding that it is not necessary to specify qualifications for board members.

“Because we are talking about the survival of this thing (BLA). This organisation will survive if it has members. But if we actively alienate the majority of the members and they decide, ‘Ok we are not wanted here’, and they take their business and go elsewhere, what would happen to the organisation? Water finds its own level. Just leave the thing open as it was before, and the requisite people would come forward,” she said.

IWN Conversations

3 thoughts on “At committee meeting, BLA members reject new election rules

  1. Phillip C Jackson says:

    Membership is key, inclusive membership is key-er…

  2. Teacherfang (@Llijame) says:

    “Qualification vs Credibility”; “academic biased”…have we gone mad? WTF are we really discussing here? Are we now anti-intelligence? Just because one group of highly “qualified” folks f’cked up BLA, doesn’t mean, we go and elect folks with “credibility” but clueless in managing a multi-million organisation.

    I see nothing wrong in suggesting that folks with specific qualifications to be in charge of BLA….do you want a dentist performing heart surgery on you or your love one? I didn’t think so. Its clear that BLA was poorly managed in the past and drastic reform is needed to ensure the long-term survival of this Organisation. And if by drastic, it means having specialized qualifications for certain positions, then so be it.

  3. J James says:

    I agree with Miss Sutherland’s position. Those who need to step up to the plate will. Some things just don’t need to be said. At the same time, we have to keep an eye on our tendency to “dumb down”‘ the nation in the name of democracy by ‘dumbing down’ its organisations and bodies. Enough niggling and higgling. For heaven’s sake, people, stop it! Get on with the show! The survival of B&L is no joke now.

    Much outreach work needs to be done with those who have placed requests for withdrawal of deposits and equity. Some close and targeted work needs to be done with these people. Announcements to people won’t cut it. Maintaining an air of secrecy and reticence about the organisation’s position won’t cut it either. Use the press; it’s your friend, not your enemy.

    And for heaven’s sake, B&L, please don’t think for one second about extending or modifying any of those March 4 conditions of withdrawal. People have been sufficiently panicked this year.

About I-Witness News

iWitness News is the leading source of daily and breaking news and current affairs information from and about St. Vincent and the Grenadines. We were founded in February 2009 by Kenton X. Chance, a career journalist and adhere to the highest standards of journalism.