Accountant, Kirk Da Silva speaks at the forum in Kingstown Thursday night. (iWN photo)

A prominent accountant says that value added tax (VAT) is a good levy but he is concerned about some of the items on which it has been imposed in St. Vincent and the Grenadines and the potential impact on the nation’s poorest.

Kirk Da Silva, speaking at a review of the 2017 national budget in Kingstown Thursday night, suggested that there are other options that the government could have taken besides imposing VAT on basic food items last year and increasing the rate this year.

Lawmakers, last month, approved a proposal by the government to increase the rate of VAT from 15 to 16 per cent and to also increase the VAT threshold from EC$120,000 to EC$300,000.

“But if you’re increasing VAT, … bearing in mind the context in which the budget was prepared, aren’t we taking a bit more money from people’s hand and reducing their disposable income? Shouldn’t we have done the opposite?” Da Silva said.

Da Silva said that while VAT is widely criticised, he believes it is good tax because there is increased or mass participation.

If you wish to receive iWN updates by WhatsApp, please add +1-784-532-4252… Be sure to send us a message when you do. “Notification” and the name you would like us to add you as would suffice…

He told the town hall meeting, which was organised by the Teachers’ Union and the Public Service Union that he is also concerned about the items upon which VAT is imposed.

In the 2016 Budget, Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves announced the introduction of VAT on packaged rice for retail sale; table and cooking butter; brown sugar, whole chicken and chicken parts, except chicken back, neck and wings — items that were zero-rated when the tax was increased in 2007.

VAT exempted items, namely lentils and pigeon peas; cooking oil, except coconut oil; shortenings; salt; yeast; and baking powder, were made taxable, Gonsalves also announced.

He said the changes were necessary to widen the tax base and improve buoyancy.

Da Silva noted that VAT was imposed on basic food items such as salt and chicken.

“To me, if we use salt, for example, I think the reason given was that salt was bad for our health and, therefore, you would need to VAT it so that you can consume less.

“I have always learnt that salt, though, is what economists would call an inelastic product. And by inelastic, I mean that if the price goes up, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the demand is doing to be reduced.

“And, therefore, I think the time has come to say if we want revenue from it, then say you are going to have revenue from it.”

A section of the audience at the town hall meeting in Kingstown Thursday night. (iWN photo)

Da Silva said that on the question of VAT on chicken is whether it should be made a regressive tax.

“Does it become a regressive tax in terms of our society uses a lot of chicken and if we use a lot, then the poorer classes of persons — persons with lower salaries and lower income bracket — would they not pay a higher percentage of their incomes for basic food items than other individuals in higher income brackets?”

Da Silva, who was unsuccessful in his bid to become a candidate for the ruling Unity Labour Party in the December 2015 general elections, said his other area of concern is that the implementation of the capital budget over the past years has been very low.

“And it impacts on the economy. If we think the economy is bad, things are tight, then I believe the necessary mechanisms have to be put in place to encourage what I would call putting life in the economy.”

He said he was asking someone recently if the threshold of pay-as-you-earn tax (P.A.Y.E.) could not have been increased to maybe EC$30,000.

Da Silva noted that he has not done any studies and was just making a suggestion.

“Wouldn’t we, then, be giving people more money in their hand, increasing their disposable income? And if we do that, wouldn’t the increase, as a result of increased spending, not have taken care or be even more than your 1 per cent increase in VAT?”

He further asked if increasing disposable income would not have a spill off effect on businesses, in terms of sale.

“Wouldn’t there be a spill off in the country areas that people in shops and so on would have as people’s disposable income increases?” Da Silva said, adding, “As I said, it’s food for thought.”

Da Silva said that another advantage of VAT is that it minimises tax evasion and is simple to administer, compared to other taxes.

He further said that some people may argue that it is a progressive tax since consumers who spend more, pay more VAT.

“And there is the argument as well that the poorest people spend a higher proportion of their disposable income on VAT than do the richer people,” Da Silva noted.

He, however, said that he has a problem with the implementation of VAT in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, adding that businesses should be paying VAT when cash is received.

He said that when a businessperson bills a customer, the business pays VAT whether or not that money is received.

“So, if you give credit, or if you rent a building, and you are three months in arrears, your tenant has not paid up, you still have to pay over that portion of VAT, although you did not receive it,” Da Silva said.

“In my view, it creates a hardship for business people in terms of cash flow problems because it increases the cost of operation.”

He said that profit is important in a business but cash is its lifeblood.

“You can make a million dollars profit but if you don’t receive and have the cash to pay your bills, then your business could go under,” he said, adding that cash flow problems create increased operational cost as businesses revert to overdrafts to finance their operations.

“And I think it is something that ought to be looked at, and I say this from a professional point of view,” Da Silva said.

9 COMMENTS

  1. I just can’t comprehend ULP’S VAT increase. I think it’s pure greed
    and if so put some if the vat money into health care. For instance building a new hospital to compliment the INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT and the tourism Industry. Wow not even a full 20
    Years of vat and The Comrade gone greedy.

  2. When Ralph Gonsalves says: “to widen the tax base and increase buoyancy.”…that is politician speak for : “to tax more people, take more money from them and get more money to us.”

  3. Mr. Da Silva talks of compassionate and sensible economics. No wonder he was not accepted as a ULP candidate. He ran for the wrong party. Instead of the party that relies on false promises, looser economics and deception he should be running for the party with the sensible intellectuals that wish to apply proven principles to improve the country.
    He should be running for the party that is for the people instead of the self-serving party where the leader spends his time traveling the world in search of loans and writing books about his greatness.

  4. It’s difficult to see how hiking up the VAT yet again “widens the tax base”… The same number of people will continue to need salt, cooking oil, and some poultry other than chicken backs. In fact, I think it would DIMINISH the “tax base,” since people who can now just barely afford to feed themselves and their families will be forced to purchase even less.

    I was last in SVG early in 2016 for a month. I was astonished at the cost of staple items. With the VAT on top of the costs of importing so many items, our grocery bills were comparable to what we spend here in the US – and we live in one of the most expensive counties in the Northeast!

    So, in addition to causing hardship for so many Vincys, upping the VAT yet again is another disincentive for your visitors, the majority of whom come for relatively long periods of time, and are essentially “householders” while there. (Already most visitors try to bring as many staple foods as they can manage, due to both high costs and the unavailability of many desired items. This practice is likely to increase as costs continue to rise. And, no, they will not react well to being charged “duty” on tins of potted lunch meat and bags of dried beans!)

    • Ralph just cannot understand your way of thinking. He instead applies “shoot yourself in the foot economics”. He is now at the stage where he is going after the poor. He tells them how he loves them while he sucks all of us dry.

  5. Instead of having a PAYE of $30,000, personal income taxes should be abolished. Corporate taxes should also be abolished. However, for cooperate taxes, repatriation of profit should be tax to create an incentive to keep the money on SVG.
    In exchange, there should he higher VAT on cigarette, soft drinks, liquors, and other non-essentials. Little if any taxes on foods, except for restaurants, and fast-foods. Higher taxes for owners of personal use vehicles, and luxury items. Less taxes on taxis, passengers’ vehicles, ferries, fishing, farming tools and equipment’s, etc.
    Focus on job creations but not government jobs – be open to business to the world. More focus on hi-tech, call-centers, and information systems jobs. The tourism sectors in SVG is underdeveloped so there is enormous potential there – greater than any Caribbean country maybe except the Bahamas. Leverage, tourists that are already in Barbados, St. Lucia, and Grenada.
    Root out serious crime. Crime is expensive to administer, and it hurts the economy. We all know who are the trouble makers. Legalized marijuana for tourists and citizens and tax it to the max but not too high to encourage a criminal element to it.
    Encourages more business like the medical universities to set in Saint Vincent. More universities should be accredited to offer MBAs and all kind of degrees to the world using mostly local talents.
    The old ways of doing business that was inherited from the colonial powers is not sustainable for SVG. Let’s get rid of poverty in Saint Vincent. It can be done.

  6. Poor people in SVG will be squeezed a thousand ways until they rebel to get their tormentors off their backs.
    I know that SVG is poor, but I was surprised to see at site: http://www.findthedata.com that except for Haiti, SVG is the poorest Caribbean nation. When this regime took over, we were in the middle of the pack. Now we are almost dead last.

  7. Robin Hood robbed the rich to give to the poor. This government robs the poor to give to themselves.

    Wake up people!

Comments are closed.