Advertisement 87
Advertisement 211
Government senator and lawyer, Ashelle Morgan, who is charged with assault with intent to wound, arrives at the Calliaqua Magistrate's Court on Tuesday. (iWN photo)
Government senator and lawyer, Ashelle Morgan, who is charged with assault with intent to wound, arrives at the Calliaqua Magistrate’s Court on Tuesday. (iWN photo)
Advertisement 219

Calliaqua Magistrate Zoila Ellis-Browne today (Tuesday), recused herself from hearing the charges in connection with the April 13 shooting of businessman Cornelius John, at his Diamond home.

“As magistrate for this case, I am obliged to recuse myself from this because Ms Morgan happens to be family counsel for me and, therefore, I cannot fairly sit in this matter,” Ellis-Browne said.

She was speaking as Assistant Director of Public Prosecution, Karim Nelson and government senator, Ashelle Morgan, a lawyer, stood in the defendant’s dock, the prosecution and defence having agreed to a joint trial for the duo.

Karim Nelson Ronnie Marks
Assistant Director of Public Prosecution, Karim Nelson, left, who is charged with wounding and unlawful discharge of a firearm, and his lawyer, Ronald Marks, arrive at the Calliaqua Magistrate’s Court on Tuesday. (iWN photo)

Ellis Browne transferred the matters to the Mesopotamia Magistrate’s Court, for hearing on Aug. 27

Kay Bacchus-Baptiste, who is representing John in the charges against him, told the court that she had a watching brief in each of the matters in which Nelson and Morgan are defendants.

Advertisement 271

Wikipedia defines a watching brief as a method normally used in criminal cases by lawyers to represent clients not directly a party to the suit and to function as an observer.

The method is normally used to help protect the rights and interests of alleged victims of a crime, or also to protect a defendant from possible malicious prosecution.

Meanwhile, Ellis-Browne, also, for the same reason, transferred the matters in which John is a defendant, sending them for hearing before the Biabou Magistrate’s Court on Aug. 20.

Cornelius John Kay Bacchus
Shooting victim and threatening language accused, Cornelius John, left, and his lawyer, Kay Bacchus-Baptiste, leave the Calliaqua Magistrate’s Court after Tuesday’s hearing. (iWN photo)

Director of Public Prosecution, Sejilla McDowall is representing the Crown in all of the matters. 

Morgan is charged that she assaulted John, with intent to wound him.

Nelson is charged with wounding John and unlawfully discharging a firearm at him.

Meanwhile, John is charged with one count of using threatening language to Morgan and two counts of using threatening language to Nicole John, his wife.

All of the offences were allegedly committed on April 13, in Diamond.

Police outside court
There was increased police presence outside the court on Tuesday. (iWN photo)

The three defendants pleaded not guilty to all charges against them when they were arraigned before the Serious Offences Court on June 27.

Morgan, Nelson, and Nelson’s cousin and driver, Vernon Adams are alleged to have been at John’s home when he (John) was shot in the left leg on April 13.

Also on Monday, Morgan appeared with new counsel, having retained Duane Daniel as her legal representative.

Counsel Ronald Marks presented Morgan and Nelson when they — as well as John — were arraigned before Chief Magistrate Rechanne Browne who transferred the matters from the Serious Offences Court in Kingstown to the Calliaqua Magistrate’s Court. 

There was increased police presence outside the court for today’s hearings.

2 replies on “Calliaqua magistrate transfers charges in Cornelius John shooting case”

  1. That’s why we have to respect the few truly democratic countries that remain in our hemisphere such as USA and the UK. If these individuals were living in these countries and committed this heinous act. The rule of law and due process would have surely taken its course.

    The separation of powers doctrine that’s embedded in SVG constitution must have been omitted without Vincentians knowledge because there is surely no independence of the judiciary existing in SVG.

Comments closed.