Prime Minister Dr. Ralph Gonsalves. (iWN file photo)

By Kenton X. Chance

Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves on Friday described as “just another step in a legal process” the decision of the High Court to allow to proceed to trial two petitions challenging the results of the December 2015 general election.

“Where we are now, clearly, this is just another step in a legal process,” Gonsalves said on radio in immediate reaction to the judgment.

“I just want to tell everybody the government continues, to tell the people of St. Vincent and the Grenadines that this doesn’t affect the functioning of anything. There is a legal process and the legal process will take its course,” he said.

In a ruling two months after hearing legal arguments, Justice Esco Henry said that while the sureties given in support of the petitions are insufficient, they are valid.

She gave each petitioner until July 7 to deposit EC$5,000 with the High Court so that the case can proceed, or have the petitions dismissed.

Electoral officials say that Gonsalves’ Unity Labour Party secured a fourth consecutive term in office, winning the December 2015 vote by an 8-7 margin.

However, the opposition New Democratic Party has filed the petitions, contending that the results were flawed and is contesting the ULP victories in North Windward and Central Leeward.

In her ruling, Justice Henry also rejected an application by the attorneys for the ULP to throw out the petitions as invalid, thereby paving the way for them to proceed to trial.

The matters had been sent to Justice Henry for hearing after the Court of Appeal concluded in March that Justice Brian Cottle had shown apparent bias in a decision in June 2016 to throw out the petitions as improperly filed.

Gonsalves said that Justice Cottle had had “two bites at the cherry in terms of the law” and on each occasion came to a conclusion in law different from Justice Henry’s.

“I don’t want people to be going about to say that the law is an ass, that two judges really can’t agree on it — but some people way well say that,” said Gonsalves, a lawyer.

Gonsalves further said that senior counsel, Anthony Astaphan, lead counsel for the government in the matter, had made public that he has written to the Chief Justice asking that a different Court of Appeal be empanelled to review that aspect of the Court of Appeal judgment relating to waiver on the apparent bias issue.

He said that Astaphan had argued before the Court of Appeal that even if there was apparent bias, the lawyers for the petitioners had gone along with the proceeding and had expressly said they had confidence in Justice Cottle hearing the matter.

“In other words, they went along with everything, and, having lost, they then try and do — for want of a better word — a forensic or judicial ambush,” Gonsalves said.

He said the government’s legal team was yet to receive the written judgement but will study it and advise. Gonsalves further announced that the government’s legal team was also in consultation with Senior Counsel Douglas Mendez of Trinidad and Tobago –“another esteemed lawyer”.

“So that this is just another judicial moment in an on-going legal battle,” Gonsalves said.

‘duly elected’ government

He said that in all of this, it must be remembered that there is a government “which was duly elected, which the CARICOM observers, the Commonwealth observers, the OAS observers said that the election was free and fair and reflected the will of the people”.

Gonsalves further said: “Now, it is not the first time that we are going to have legal challenges. People make legal challenges about elections all the time and it is now becoming — you know when you go to a restaurant and you order soup of the day, it looks as if it is now becoming litigation of the day. When you lose elections, you challenge in court.”

He said that while the law is important, it is also important to recognise representative democracy.

“The courthouse doesn’t determine who represents you. I want to emphasise that. People who represent you are those who people vote for in an election and there will be other elections in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, whether before or at the time of the year 2020 in which real flesh and blood people, who are entitled under the law and Constitution to vote, will vote. That is our system. Judges do not decide who are your representatives.”

Gonsalves said he wanted the people of the country and the supporters of his party to recognise this.

He further said that with two judges coming to different conclusions, there is “confusion on the law, which should be a very straightforward matter”.

The NDP celebrated Friday’s ruling with a rally outside the party’s headquarters, Democrat House, located on Murray’s Road, Kingstown.

Gonsalves said:

“Some who believe that they have some kind of victory here that it is a matter of time before they are inside of the seat of government, oh there is a long, long stretch before that.”

The prime minister further said that the opposition also thought they were going to be back in government in each of the four elections since 2001.

2 replies on “PM downplays court’s decision to hear election petitions”

  1. I wonder if. Mr. Ralph Gonsalves remembered what happen in the 1998 general election wasn’t the NDP a duly elected government and wasn’t it the wish of people then? .Roads were block school and businesses were close just so you can have your way..you explain that.

  2. C. ben-David says:

    Great piece but you forgot to mention the Comrade’s support for and assistance in the illegal overthrow of the Eric Garry government by the Bishop communists in Grenada, ideological support for the violent Cuban revolution by the Fidel Castro communists, and approval of other violent leftist insurrections around the globe. This man only opposes interference with political sovereignty when that interference comes from the right side of the ideological spectrum.

Comments are closed.