Arnott Hope, left died at the Milton Cato Memorial Hospital after a surgical tool was reportedly stitched up in his abdomen, purportedly shown at right.

The Ralph Gonsalves government has hired a Trinidadian professor of surgery to review the treatment of a man who died at the Milton Cato Memorial Hospital (MCMH) in late December, reportedly after a medical team stitched up a surgical tool in his abdomen.

Arnott Hope, a 58-year-old fisherman, of Pole Yard, Arnos Vale, was initially taken to the MCMH on Dec. 27 after being shot in the groin area in his community.

He underwent surgery and was reportedly in a stable condition, even after the surgical team is said to have found that one of the tools used in the surgery was unaccounted for.

The following day, Dec. 28, an x-ray of Hope is said to have confirmed that the missing surgical tool was, in fact, stitched up inside him.

Hope underwent a second surgical intervention and died at the hospital on Dec. 29.

His cause of death has been listed as hypovolemia — a state of decreased intravascular volume, which may be due to either a loss of both salt and water or a decrease in blood volume.

Hope’s family has threatened legal action and has retained lawyer Israel Bruce to look into the matter.

iWitness News has seen a copy of an x-ray film from the MCMH bearing Hope’s name that suggests that a surgical tool was, in fact, stitched up in his body.

Speaking at a press conference in Kingstown on Tuesday, Gonsalves said there were some questions raised about the treatment that Hope received at MCMH.

“There is no suggestion that there was any negligence but because of certain circumstances, I had spoken to the chief medical officer (Simone Keizer-Beache) and ask that she discuss the matter properly among the professionals and the ministry and the services of a professor of surgery from the region has been engaged. There are terms of reference as to this patient; from the time he entered, he was treated,” the prime minister said.

Gonsalves noted that his government launched, in October 2019, a Charter of Patients’ Rights and Responsibilities.

“… well, if this is the first case in which we are going to have a review, so be it.

“But this is the second decade of the 21st Century,” he said, adding that his government has spent a lot of money on health and has decentralised the delivery of health.

“We spend 80-something million dollars a year on health and the decentralisation means there is less pressure on the Milton Cato Memorial Hospital than there was before,” Gonsalves said, adding that the Modern Medical and Diagnostic Centre and the polyclinics are taking pressure off MCMH.

“If the care of a particular patient was not optimal, we need to know because we need to know that the best has been done.

Gonsalves further said that the medical service involves doctors, nurses, and other health professionals.

“And while the delivery of medical services is about them also, the primary focus of medical services has to be the patient.”

Gonsalves said:

“Nobody, incidentally, has come to me about this patient you know. Nobody. No wife, no son, no daughter, no family. It’s just that certain matters were reported to me and I asked in light of those reports, what are we doing.

“I don’t want this to be a secret,” he said, adding that where the questions are they may be properly answered and everybody involved may well be vindicated.

“That’s not the point. The point is, that everyone must know there is a process where we acknowledge that patients have rights and there is a charter of rights and responsibilities and everybody who delivers medical services must know what are the patient’s rights and responsibilities and they must know what obligations they have to the patients and the patients must also know their rights and responsibilities.

“We are not looking for any wrongdoing; we just want to know if anything went wrong.”

“… This is a humble person. Thank God is not Ralph Gonsalves’ child or family or they woulda say Ralph is only doing it or urging because it hit home.  I don’t know the person from Adam and I am not the one who decided that this must be done.  I asked the question and said give me an answer. This is the answer and we just wait and see that this independent review take place and everybody, nurses, doctors, everybody, every health professional who is treating patients must know that the patient has rights. This is no longer the age when you say that medicine is something you practice only in private.

“As you notice, I am careful in circumscribing my remarks so that I don’t say anything.”

The prime minister said there are a lot of very good professionals in the hospital.

“I just want to make sure that we all work to the highest possible standards in all the circumstances.

Asked how he came to the conclusion of no suggestion of negligence, Gonsalves said:

“Because there is no suggestion of negligence by those in the health system who spoke to me.”

He, however, said the questions about the treatment Hope received “can only come through an independent review, because from the reports that I saw, when I posed the question, it was not clear to me, reading it, because I am not a medical doctor, and the view was expressed to me, ok they would get an independent person to do a review. 

“So I can’t make a suggestion that at any stage there was negligence and that suggestion is not being made.”

Gonsalves said he expects that the review would be conducted expeditiously.

“I am hopeful that before the end of February we should be able to get this review done. Whether or not this review will be published, I can’t tell you because I don’t want to pre-judge any issue.”

He, however, reiterated:

“Every patient, however humble he or she appears, at a clinic, at a hospital, that patient must be accorded the optimal health care available in all the circumstances. If you don’t have a particular piece of equipment that you need, that’s a different story. You notice I am very precise and careful in my choice of words.”

4 replies on “Death of patient at MCMH to be investigated”

  1. The man is dead. Now, “Because there is no suggestion of negligence by those in the health system who spoke to me.” Are you for real? Sadly yes. Then, “Every patient, however humble he or she appears, at a clinic, at a hospital, that patient must be accorded the optimal health care available in all the circumstances. If you don’t have a particular piece of equipment that you need, that’s a different story. You notice I am very precise and careful in my choice of words.” —If the instrument is later found to be inside the body and have cost the man his life. Nobody will be held accountable and we will get experts from overseas to look into it.
    Gonsalves you really take the cake. We don’t even respect the dead anymore and people life aint worth a penny in SVG.
    This man did not die of natural causes. The radiography clearly show a surgical instrument inside the body. Is that not malpractice?

  2. Did they not count needles and sponges before closing the man’s wound? This has been the standard all over the world for over 50 years? This is gross negligence. No doubt about that. The standard is that everything is counted and documented before the start of the operation and before closing. If something is not correct, everything stops until that something is found. Whether that something is inside the patient or has fallen on the floor. Sometimes one has to crawl under the table looking to see if something has fallen, and to retrieve it. XRay is done immediately if item is not found after searches by the surgical team. Had they followed ORDINARY standards, the instrument would have been found and removed right away. There is absolutely no excuse for this. GROSS NEGLIGENCE
    Hypovolemia – low volume, did he bleed out? One does not loose intravascular volume like you loose a milk tooth. Why would he be loosing salt and water? That much sweat? Does the hospital not have replacement fluids? (Locally known as drips) The blood bank had no blood? No family to donate blood? Did they not make a diagnosis and so did not know that he needed replacement fluids?
    All these questions with simple answers which are being hidden. Again GROSS NEGLIGENCE.

  3. What do you mean when you stated there is no suggestion of negligence by those in the health system?
    Can someone please explain?
    Who is covering for who?
    Why a surgical tool had to be sewn up in a patience without one of the team member noticing that?

    What madness in all my life I have never heard such drama as this. SMDH!

Comments are closed.