Advertisement 87
Advertisement 211
Annamay Lewis Clauston Francis

The accused, Annamay Lewis, right, and Superintendent of Police Clauston Francis. (Composite image)

Advertisement 219

Chief detective Superintendent of Police Clauston Francis has denied the allegation by Annamay Lewis, 56, who, last week, saw the charge that she wounded Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves on Aug. 5 withdrawn. 

“She tells lies from the top of her mouth to the bottom of her mouth,” Francis told iWitness News when asked about Lewis’ claim that he went into her bedroom as she was putting on her underwear when police went to her house, in Layou, on the night of Aug. 5 to arrest her.

“When we got to her house, her front door was locked. And I knocked and we said ‘Police!’ And then I asked the officer, Corporal Andrews, to deal with her because I know they are both females.”

While Lewis has been freed of the charge that she wounded Gonsalves — who was struck in the head as he walked among protesters in Kingstown — she will be tried, on Jan. 4, 2022, on a charge that on Aug. 5, in Kingstown, she threw missiles to the danger of persons present. 

Francis, who is the head of the Criminal Investigation Department and the lead investigator in the matter, told iWitness News that he does not want to comment on the matter because it is before the court. 

Advertisement 21

“Well, all of that might come out in court. You don’t really know what might happen. But the matter surrounding her is in court but what she is saying about me, I was there when she was putting on her underwear; that is so far from the truth. 

“It’s the same way she said she never pelt any stone at the prime minister and she’s innocent and all kinds of things. And then at the end of the day, the video shows what she did. So Annamay is known to be lying, maybe from since she was born,” he said.

Speaking at a New Democratic Party (NDP) press conference on Friday, two days after the wounding charge was dropped, Lewis praised her lawyers, Kay Bacchus-Baptiste, a former NDP senator, and Israel Bruce, an NDP senator, for their representation. 

The arrest

She said that on Aug. 5, she went to Kingstown to buy provisions for the stall that she operates in Layou.

Lewis said that she left the produce with someone and joined the protest around 1 p.m.

She said that she had left home with a rag and a little purse in which she put her phone.

“When I get to where the mic was set up, there were some people there with water. And I asked for a bottle of water. So I had a bottle of water in my hand and the rag. Later, then I leave and went to my home. When I reach home, I take a shower. And then I went to my bed. 

“I was in a doze when I hear the door was knocking.  … when I get to the door, … it was Mr. Francis with his men them. There was one lady. … When he gets into the house, he say, ‘You alone live in this big house here?’. I said, ‘Yes’. 

“Came straight in because I went back in the bedroom because I wasn’t properly [dressed]. So as I went back into the bedroom to get clothes to put on. Came into the bedroom. The lady said to him, ‘She’s putting on her clothes.’ When he came I was putting on my underwear. Because I didn’t have on any underwear.”

Lewis said that Francis told her that she had injured the prime minister and that he was in the hospital and that she would have to apologise to the head of government.

“I then left my home; came out in the vehicle. From there, they drive me into hospital where they park me up there long time. And he said to me, he is going by the prime minister and come back. … he stay so long because I was there for a long, long time. 

When he came back from the Prime Minister, he said to me, ‘The Prime Minister is getting ready to go overseas and later I will take you by the Prime Minister.”

Gonsalves was flown to Barbados the same night of the incident for medical attention.

Lewis said that after they left the hospital, the police took her to CID. 

Signing ‘three times’ at CID

“Soon as I get to CID, he (Francis) went into his room. And then he tell the lady to bring me into his room. … he asked me to sit down, I sit down and then he started writing. 

“First, he write, he asked me to sign and then I signed and he write again and he asked me to sign and I sign. Then he began to ask me some questions. And I said to him if I fire stone at the prime minister, I will … apologise, even if I have to go on the radio station to … apologise. 

“[He] didn’t even ask me if I want a lawyer, if I have a lawyer.  And then the third — because is three times he write so I had sign three times on  that paper and then after that he asked me to hold on outside.”

Lewis said that the following day, Francis told her that she was charged.

“Later on, they took me to Questelles Police Station where they have me the Friday night, the Saturday and the Sunday and then took me to court the Monday morning. And then I plead not guilty. And then I had to get somebody to bail me. When I reach home, all my produce that I was selling spoil. Everything spoil,” she said.  

`

Advertisement 128

13 replies on “Annamay ‘lies from the top of her mouth to the bottom’ — chief detective”

  1. Avatar Of Gersham AlexanderGersham alexander says:

    I believe he did it. Maybe not on purpose but lack of respect for the lady. The police in SVG has no respect for ladies. Do you remember a few months ago that some of the officers physically abuse two sisters causing on to be hospitalized???? You all need to do better.

  2. Avatar Of Nancysauldemersnancysauldemers says:

    For even the most junior of police officers to make a public statment such as ““She tells lies from the top of her mouth to the bottom of her mouth,” or “So Annamay is known to be lying, maybe from since she was born,” would be unprofessional and suggestive of a lack of judgement and self-control. But for someone in a supposed leadership position like Chief detective Superintendent of Police Clauston Francis to do so is absolutely mind-boggling. This does not bode well for public confidence in the police force.

  3. So who is lying here? The case was dropped which means that all Francis wrote and had her signed were fake news. The judge should see through this scheme and dismiss the case. The police always throw a lot of crap on the wall and hope something will stick. If the police woman made the statement Annamay claimed, then Francis know the colour of her draws.

  4. That man is a pig, he assaulted me and got away with it. The police are the biggest gangsters in SVG corrupt and full of lies.

  5. As a former Law Enforcement Officer from the USA it pains me to witness the very poor behavior and training of the SVG police force. We certainly had “bad eggs” in the jurisdiction where I worked but they were an exception. It is the opposite in SVG. I ask: “Why aren’t high standards encouraged in the SVG Police Force?” I am sure that I could change the reputation of the SVG Police in very short order, or, I would be removed from my position for trying. I am sure that many officers want change but are told “go along to get along”.It is much like the “push” for vaccines. Real evil is running the world today. It can only be stopped by dedicated people that know the difference between wrong and right. Leadership in SVG seems to be confused about that right now!

  6. Avatar Of Urban AlexanderUrban Alexander says:

    This police officer is an embarrassment to the already embattled police force. His comments about Annamay being a liard is prejudicial. This comment alone is basis to throw out whatever remnants of the case remaining before the court. A very dispecable police officer he is.

  7. They get away with it so long, that they make it a habit, all of them need to be held to account, the public need to do this ,or it will even get worst, many maybe only a few know what the truth look like

  8. Where words come from that where it belongs , a liar must know another liar, that police seems not to know what is Professionalism. shameful.

  9. Avatar Of Nathan Jolly GreenNathan Jolly Green says:

    The comment by this man is outrageous and is in my belief made to try and convince the magistrate. He has no right at all to be making such comments prior to an ongoing court case. Lack of professionalism and knowing right from wrong, of course they know the difference, but choose wrong. I suppose when the world boss behaves so, it encourages all the little jumped up scamps to do the same.

Comments are closed.