Minister of Finance, Camillo Gonsalves, left, and Opposition Leader Godwin Friday. (Photos Ministry of Health & iWN)

Leader of the Opposition Godwin Friday has explained why opposition lawmakers did not submit to Parliament a question about the Minister of Finance Camillo Gonsalves’ alleged involvement in the Yugge Farrell sex scandal.

Friday told the New Democratic Party press conference on Wednesday that he honestly thought that the minister would have used the “Statement By Minister” segment of the Jan. 30 meeting of Parliament to say what he knows about the saga.

Farrell, a 23-year-old former model half the minister’s age has claimed that he cheated on his wife with her for years.

The NDP has called on the finance minister to explain himself or resign, as the court sent Farrell for three weeks of psychiatric evaluation after she was charged with using abusive language to the minister’s wife.

Amidst the NDP’s repeated calls for the minister to explain himself, they did not include on the Jan. 30 order paper a question about the scandal, a point made on Monday by prominent lawyer, Parnell “PR” Campbell, QC, on his weekly television programme, “The Law and You”.

Campbell said he was surprised that opposition lawmakers walked out of Parliament on Jan. 30 after the minister did not comment on the scandal.

“I found that strange, because there was some agitation directed at the Honourable Camillo, agitating that he ought to make a statement, but not one of them tabled a question to him. I know this is politics and sometimes you don’t discern what the strategies are at the moment.
“But the question that lingered with me was how come they walked out on the ground that he was not making a statement but did not ask him any question.”

Campbell said that his comment was not an indication of his agreeing that Camillo should make a statement.

“Because from what I have read in that saga, no allegation was made against him touching and concerning the discharge of his responsibilities as a minister,” Campbell said.

Person protest outside Parliament ahead of the Budget Address on Monday. (iWN photo)

The finance minister has remained mum, apparently following the advice of his father, Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves, to maintain a “dignified silence”.

Friday said that the NDP’s repeated calls for an explanation have not been condemnatory.

“We did not judge him one way or the other. We have said, listen you are a public figure, you have an important office, you have a duty to the people to do so.

“He did not do so publicly. He was told, advised, not to do so. Honestly, I am not kidding you here: I thought that he would take the opportunity in the Parliament under the Statements by Ministers, which is on the Order Paper.

“That is the place that screams out to you and that say if I have something to say to the people, this is where I would say it. So, at the very last resort, this is where you ought to say it. And I sat and I waited.”

Friday said he had discussed with his parliamentary colleagues the course of action that the minister was likely to take, and some of them had posited that the minister would not have made a statement in Parliament.

“I said that’s where it ought to be done as a last resort and I was disappointed, but it was stronger than that, I felt that this was so contemptuous. Here you have a statement by ministers on the order paper.

“It is not my obligation, my duty to bring a question to ask him to say what? To say what you know about the scandal? The first thing they would say, this matter is sub judice, you don’t have any comment about it because the matter involves somebody who is in the court.

“In any event, he has an obligation beyond what I, as the Leader of the Opposition or any member of the Parliament ought to pull and coax out of him.”

Friday said that when he rose in Parliament on Jan. 30, it was to remind the finance minister of his obligation and to encourage him to use the opportunity to make a statement.

“That is much more effective than putting it in writing on a piece of paper and submitting it as a question. I stood up in the Parliament; everybody saw and still, silence.

“But he spoke on behalf of everybody else in the Parliament,” Friday said, referring to the Budget Debate one week later in which only the finance minister spoke, after the opposition again walked out of Parliament.

Friday said that if the minister continues to remain silent, the people will make their judgment on that.

“But we will continue to say that he has an obligation to do so. The people of St. Vincent and the Grenadines, we are not fools. They don’t live, as they said on the placards, they don’t live on anybody’s plantation anymore,” he said.

“They put the people in the Parliament. I say to the people of this country, take your responsibility seriously. When they don’t respect you, you don’t have to vote for them. Get rid of them. And this is what happened in this case. That’s showing a lack of respect for the people of this country, the people who put you there, who elected you. You have a ‘dignified silence’.

“What is it? It’s beneath you? Is that what you are saying, it is beneath you to respond to the people?”

Friday said that the finance minister has disrespected the people by refusing to comment on the scandal.

He pointed out that the scandal has attracted international attention and was recently reported on by the New Statesman, a British political and cultural magazine.

“I read that last night with some alarm. Because this is somebody, who I am told, was here as a tourism journalist primarily and got caught up with the stuff that’s the most important story while she was here, wrote this in a British, well reputed, left-wing news magazine called the New Statesman,” he said of the article and its writer.

8 replies on “‘It’s beneath you to respond to the people?’”

  1. Friday is the one who is “disrespecting the people” continually dragging Ms. Farrell’s name through the salacious mud of partisan politics.

    Shame on you, man!

  2. A Senior Minister in any Government should not have to wait to be asked to explain himself to the people on an alleged scandalous extramarital affair. His supporters at lease deserve a simple apology for the scandalous hype of the past weeks. The reason why his father suggested to him not to speak, it is because the PM knows the standard thing to do is to apologize or say something without being asked.
    As Mr. Campbell noted>> “I know this is politics and sometimes you don’t discern what the strategies are at the moment.” Correctly so PR Campbell QC, the said purpose for the Opposition’s expectation of the Senior Minister of our SVG Government.. At the same time, there were no need for the Opposition to walk out and should have debated the budget along with the attitude of arrogance of the Finance Minister in his delay to respond to the people
    According to Mr. Campbell>> “from what I have read in that saga, no allegation was made against him touching and concerning the discharge of his responsibilities as a minister.” Really? Should I be surprised with such statement? No! We all listen to the many videos by Yugge Farrell and her parents, yes; it is alleged but most extramarital relationships are always alleged.
    Sadly, just few hours ago in a conversation with an accomplished SVG married man; I was told that nothing is wrong even if there was an affair; as it is normal and acceptable within our SVG society. The issue of overstepping ones power or abusing of power he sees no problem with that also. What a sad case of disrespect to us women, and to realize that we WOMEN nurtured those sons. Do we teach them how to treat us? So why do we hope for any explanation form the Senior Finance Minister? Well, the only hope is that there are some Ministers with ethics within the ULP Government who are willing to cross the floor in joining us WOMEN/MOTHERS IN SOLIDITY TO WHAT HAVE BECOME THE NORM.

    1. Please tell us in what way did Camillo Gonsalves “overstep his power or abuse his power” if he did indeed have an extramarital affair with Yugge Farrell?

      Was she employed by the government and did he threaten to have her fired if she didn’t consent to his advances? Not as far as I know.

      Was she otherwise working for him or under his control? Not as far as know.

      Was he blackmailing her into forced sex for some indiscretion she had committed? Not as far as I know.

      Did he physically force her to have sex with him? Not as far as know.

      If he is not guilty of any of these or related transgressions, then I suggest that you and Godwin Friday mind your own damn business.

      1. C. ben-David; It would appear that you yourself are not confident if he is guilty or not. Let me re-state you > “‘IF’ he is not guilty of any of these or related transgressions”. Let’s be sure now!

  3. ONE QUESTION

    In the case of the Finance Minister it is alleged that he had extramarital relationships without any proof provided. However in the case of a prominent elected member of the NDP there is a child which is physical proof that extramarital relationship existed. Why the NDP Leader is not calling for an explanation from his colleague immoral behavior? Is it that only elected members of government should explain themselves? Why Vincentians can not see the hypocrisy in the NDP position on this saga?

  4. Friday you are too out of place. People are smarter than you. You will never get a statement. Camillo keep your mouth shut.

  5. Our people in society is so close minded. Camillo was elected by the people in East St. George, do you think he owed the people in the constituency an apology? Do you think he owed the nation an apology? Who pays his monthly salary? It’s the hard working taxpayers in this country. So to hell with all this BS that he shouldn’t say anything.

Comments are closed.