Advertisement 87
Advertisement 211
Advertisement 219

By C. ben-David

Despite an intense interest in the alleged increase in crime in St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG) in recent years, comprehensive local records are out of date or incomplete. Notwithstanding the unwillingness of the current regime to share information about this important topic with the citizenry in a timely fashion, except for murder statistics — which it cannot easily conceal — Table 1 summarises the locally available crime records for the nine years 2008-2016 period (with the 2008-2012 data gathered from local records).

Table 1. Reported Crimes by Type of Offense in SVG, 2008-2016

  2008 2009 2010     2011     2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Murder        27        20        24          21        28 24 38 26 40
Sexual assault    171    207    168        459    175 229 228 196 236
Robbery        47        68    120        166    167 149 80 86 77
Other assault* 1,735 1,975 2,020   2,158 1,770
Property* 3,722 4,258 4,602   5,222 4,524
Other* 2,993 3,056 2,943   3,182 2,853
Total 8,695 9,584 9,877 11,208 9,690 n.a.** n.a. n.a. n.a

*data not available for 2013-2016; **data not available.

The data in Table 1 need to be qualified and interpreted as follows:

Advertisement 271
  1. The figures refer only to reports made to or by the police. They do not reflect actual arrests or convictions for criminal activity. This is a critical issue that cannot be overemphasized. For example, property crimes involving the theft of low value or small amounts of items via shoplifting, pickpocketing, and other petty theft generally go unreported in SVG as they do around the world. But this does not necessarily mean that the extent of such crimes is lower or higher in SVG than in other countries, an issue I explore in a later essay where I will argue that we have always been a hyper-theft society going back to the slavery era.


  1. Since the figures show a great deal of fluctuation from year to year, a longer time period, say 20 years, would be needed to discover long-term trends.


  1. The reported violent crime rate in 2012 was 2,141 per 100,000 population while the reported property crime rate was 2,752 per 100,000 population. By global standards, the first figure is very high: over five times higher than the United States for the same year. The second figure is very similar to the United States rate for the same year.


  1. The data do not include arrests for growing, possessing, selling, or consuming cannabis (marijuana) or cocaine which are tabulated separately and which together resulted in an average of 380 yearly convictions (as opposed to reports) during these five years.


  1. Again, as in other countries, many crimes including sexual assaults like rape, other physical assault, and crimes against property are never reported to the authorities. For example, unless there is provable evidence of the perpetrator, praedial larceny (the theft of farm produce) and the money laundering of the illegal proceeds of the marijuana and cocaine trade are rarely reported.


  1. Sexual assault includes adult rape but is exceeded by the combination of statutory rape (coerced or forced rape of a person under the age of 15), incest, and indecent assault (for example, groping someone on their private parts). Again, a great deal of sexual assault – perhaps 70 per cent or more if SVG is like other countries around the world – is never reported to the authorities. Nevertheless, the data show that reported sexual assaults have seesawed considerably over the years as has the crime of robbery. There is no upward trend in these crimes, as Dr. Godwin Friday, leader of the main opposition New Democratic Party has repeatedly implied.


  1. “Other assault” includes wounding with a weapon (infrequently including a firearm) and assault causing bodily harm (beating someone without the use of a weapon). It is also reasonable to assume that many such assaults are not reported to the police, especially when they involve “bad boys” who prefer to settle matters among themselves.


  1. The most serious crime of all in our society — murder — represented less than one-quarter of one per cent of all crimes during the five-year period even though it is by far the most reported and publicized of criminal acts. In fact, this proportion would be much lower still if the figures in Table 1 referred to actual crimes as opposed to reported

Though the average of 24 murders during the 2008-2012 period is well below the average of 34 during the 2013-2017 period, the data I have found (which contains unfortunate gaps for the 2013-2016 period) does not say that total crimes other than murder have also increased significantly during this period. None of this diminishes the seriousness, moral or otherwise, of unlawfully taking the life of another person, only that such acts must be contextualized to be understood. Still, it is important to note that the average number of murders during the nine-year period shown in Table 1 was 28 per year. Even if the 40 murders in 2017 are included, this average would be 29.

  1. By far the most common crimes in SVG are property crimes: shoplifting, pickpocketing, damage to property, fraud, theft of animals and agricultural produce, burglary, and other forms of petty and large-scale larceny. Again, except perhaps for burglary, the reported number of such crimes grossly underestimates their true extent along with the fact that such crimes have been with us since European settlement if not earlier.

How do these crime rates compare to other countries in the world? This is an important question because if it turns out that we have a very low comparative crime rate, we should simply be grateful for this and move on. If, on the other hand, our crime rate is sky-high by global standards, we should ask ourselves why this is so and what can be done to reduce it.

Though other examples will be given in future essays, a single case will suffice to at least question the one-to-one correlation between crime and economic factors like poverty and unemployment. In one of the richest countries in the world with one of world’s lowest unemployment rates – the United States — the estimated 2012 rate of violent crime was 387 offences per 100,000 inhabitants while the property crime rate was 2,859 offences per 100,000 inhabitants. The difference between the United States and SVG (see point 3 above) is of interest on two grounds.

First, most people would be surprised that for a country that continues to have a generalized “Wild West” reputation for violence based on its history of armed conflict to obtain independence from Great Britain in 1776, the brutal treatment of the aboriginal population highlighted by the “Indian Wars” during the late 19th century, the lawlessness and violence of the settlement of the western part of the country that produced the Wild West characterization, the brutality shown to the large African American population during and after the slavery era, the habitual portrayal of America as a global warmonger, the disturbing number of contemporary mass shootings, and the country’s world-leading gun ownership numbers, little SVG still had a violent crime rate over five times higher in 2012 than America and presumably many other years before and after.

Second, It should be somewhat unexpected to learn that rich America had a reported property crime rate in 2012 that was four per cent higher than a relatively poor country like SVG unless it is simplistically argued that there is more to steal in the United States. Again, however, it needs to be asked whether reports of such crimes are simply higher in the United States.

Both observations suggest that the relationship between crime and poverty is much more complex than Dr. Friday would like us to believe, an assertion examined throughout this series of essays.


This is the third in a series of essays on crime and the economy in SVG. Find them all here.

The views expressed herein are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the opinions or editorial position of iWitness News. Opinion pieces can be submitted to [email protected]

The opinions presented in this content belong to the author and may not necessarily reflect the perspectives or editorial stance of iWitness News. Opinion pieces can be submitted to [email protected].

5 replies on “The ins and outs of crime in SVG”

  1. Duke DeArment says:

    As you mention as well as allude to throughout your article, the statistics are based on what is reported.
    Although there is nothing else we can go by in this instance the quip…
    “Statistics are for losers.”
    …really is true in this instance. Because not only are there no statistics in many of those years, we do not know how accurate they are or if someone refused to not only submit them, Maybe they were not recorded at all. In my case, when some of these crimes have been committed against me or my wife, I do not even bother to go to the police because in the 15 or so years we have lived here we have noticed that most of the time the police are not interested in the “minor” crimes. We have had break-ins where things have been stolen, instances where men have walked behind my wife threatening that she has to have sex with them, vandalism to property in broad daylight with witnesses, etc… Some of those crimes, in the early years we reported but we had to continually beg and prod the police to do something, anything about it such as fingerprints when all my wife’s jewelry was stolen. Items handed down from mother to daughter for generations. We have realized that essentially the police were not interested. Vincentians have told me that unless the crimes are drugs or murder or you are a very prominent person, you will not get any action.
    For that reason, we do not report crimes anymore. What is the use when it is a total waste of OUR time. For the most part, as an average citizen in Saint Vincent:…You are on your own.
    I know for a fact that at least 90& of thefts are not reported. It has happened to us and so very many people I know and virtually everyone realized it does no good at all to even try report thefts.

  2. C.ben-David, I questioned the accuracy of your data. How reliable are the sources from which the data were obtained? I say that bearing in mid you finding with respect to the newly commissioned AIA. You predicted doomsday with respect to the suitability and location of the airport with respect to the prevalence of strong wind at the airport. None of your fears and predictions materialized. There is a common adage that elephanta have good memories.

    1. You are confusing me with the “late” and unlamented Peter Binose. I never, ever “… predicted doomsday with respect to the suitability and location of the airport with respect to the prevalence of strong wind at the airport.” If you hae proof that I am wrong, please post the source. If you have proof that my data is is not accurate, please post the accurate data and their source.

      If you have neither, then please shut your lying you-know-what.

  3. Vincy in New York says:

    Here we go again with a rather biased interpretation using insufficient data to conclude that there is no relationship between poverty and crime.

    What are the official poverty levels between 2008 and 2016? What about the unemployment levels? These are rhetorical questions because C. ben David does not have or provide the figures.

    Answer this question: How can you come to a conclusion that there is no relationship between poverty and crime when you do NOT show the poverty levels for the corresponding years?

    You definitely tried. Grade C-

    1. You are very impatient. This is only one essay in a series of many more. I will answer all your questions using the baset avialable data in later essays.

      Indeed, if I put everything in one long piece of 10,000 words, no body would both to read it.

      Don’t be so hasty. The truth will be revealed for all to read with the passage of time.

Comments closed.