Advertisement 328
Advertisement 211
Advertisement 219

By Ben Z. Comay-Adams

 “To restore and keep the public’s confidence in the integrity of their government, state government and its officials must be open honest and transparent”. John Lynch

“I still have a passion in my heart to destroy all that is ‘filthy’ — to use your expression — in the status quo.” Ralph Gonsalves, Aug. 18, 1997

There is consensus among progressive thinkers that openness and transparency of government to the citizens in all areas, including financial management, are critical for a successful democracy (Piotrowski and Van Ryzin, 2007).

Even before the Unity Labour Party (ULP) soundly defeated Mitchell’s New Democratic Party (NDP) at the polls in 2001, the veritable puppet-master driving its leadership then, declared to the public his commitment to open, honest and transparent governance, even as he waged a campaign lambasting Sir James Mitchell and his NDP administration, condemning them for mismanaging the economy and wallowing in the stench of corruption, on such matters as the Ottley Hall debacle.

Advertisement 21

So, whilst still in opposition, the ULP took a bill to the House of Assembly in a gesture of trying to enact Integrity legislation for Parliamentarians. It did not pass into law then and nothing more has been heard about that bill since, even after the ULP came into government in 2001, when it took over and maintained full and complete control of the legislative agenda to the present day.

Ralph Gonsalves, who was a prime minister-in-waiting, as he stalked his ill-starred prey Vincent Beache the then Leader of the Opposition, repelled challenges from those who questioned his own commitment to open, honest and transparent government. For instance, in August 1997, Ralph responded to Patrick Hughes, one such pundit, who ridiculed him as being duplicitous for performing as advocate for criminal elements in the law courts on the one hand, whilst on the other simultaneously projecting himself in the political arena as a champion against corruption in government.

Gonsalves explained to Mr. Hughes that “… if I had your wealth, I would have devoted myself full-time to politics. Unfortunately, I do not have the means to do so and an opposition parliamentarian’s salary and allowances are insufficient to meet my family commitments. I own a house, ten or so acres of agricultural land, two vehicles which need insurance policy, and modest savings accumulated over 23 years of continuous employment. I have five children, four of whom are aged between 16 years and two years. I have to plan for their education and well-being. (Incidentally, I am in favour of electoral candidates disclosing their assets and liabilities by nomination day). The long and short of it is that I must continue to labour simultaneously at my two mistresses: Law and Politics. My monthly income as an Opposition Parliamentarian is as follows:

  • Salary after tax: $1,592.08
  • Transport Allowance: $650
  • Entertainment Allowance: $650
  • Constituency office Allowance: $1,500
  • Total: EC$4,392.08

Such a signal of transparency could only be admired. The public was given what appeared to have been a comprehensive account of the financial affairs of the Gonsalves family, in his appeal for support prior to 2001, to be elected to a principal role in government.

The question which many Vincentians are now being asked to consider, as the ULP seeks a fifth consecutive term in office and the Prime Minister asserts his claims to becoming a “Five Star General” is, has he remained true to his professed principles, his promises and to the positive expectations which the public held about the quality of open honest and accountable government which the ULP offered then?  

All those who subscribe to the notion of integrity legislation in SVG may continue to hold their collective breath. That, too, shall come when the ULP is returned to a fifth consecutive term in office. The promise will finally be kept and a current statement of personal financial means will be coming from the prime minister and all parliamentarians.

There have been persistent reports about the appearances of nepotism and cronyism as features of the ULP administrations between 2001 and now.

Recently, the public became aware of a letter from the Ministry of Finance dated Jan. 24, 2017 addressed to the Chief Executive Officer of Caribbean Lifestyle & High Flyers, Frenches Gate, PO Box 1349, St Vincent and the Grenadines, that informed:

“Dear Mrs. Gonsalves. Reference is made to your letter dated December 15, 2016. Please be advised that Cabinet has granted approval for a 50% waiver on Import Duty and VAT on a quantity of equipment as per the attached list, to be used to outfit a commercial kitchen and bar at Argyle International Airport. By copy hereof, the Comptroller of Customs and Excise is authorized to grant the said concession.”

This letter is signed, Director General of Finance and Planning. The chief executive officer of this entity is by all indications the wife of the prime minister. Of course, if members of the PM’s family have exceptional entrepreneurial skills, why should they not be afforded every opportunity to exploit them via transactions with government agencies, to the advantage of their personal interests?

At an earlier date, Camilllo Gonsalves, the Prime Minister’s “blood son”, who was then an inexperienced lawyer returning to SVG, was appointed as a senior Crown Counsel in his father’s administration. His letter of appointment dated Sept. 1, 2005 issued by the Chief Personnel Officer stated that:

“You will receive salary at the fixed rate of $62,760 per annum in grade 13. The following allowances will be paid: Allowance in lieu of private practice $8,400 per annum. Housing Allowance $3,600 per annum; Entertainment Allowance $5,400 per annum. A commuted Transport Allowance $6,000 per annum. Additional Allowances of $22,800 per annum.”

He was also made legal advisor to International Airport Development Company Ltd a wholly-owned, limited liability company of the government of St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Incorporated in 2004, which was given a mandate to spearhead the construction of the Argyle International Airport and to help put in place the management systems for its future operations. It is not apparent as to if he was paid additionally for that posting. Such generous remuneration may well be typical of the basis on which the public sector in the ULP administration recruits budding professionals of the ilk that the younger Gonsalves was then.

However, the view may be held that the PM’s son, or any of his other children and relatives who are in positions of favour in the public administration of the State, should not be made to hide their talents under a bushel, just because daddy is head of the government.

The prime minister is not shy about discussing his family business, personal or financial in public. Such transparency is a vital part of keeping the public’s confidence in the integrity of their government, its officials must be open honest and transparent.

                                         To be continued …  

The opinions presented in this content belong to the author and may not necessarily reflect the perspectives or editorial stance of iWitness News. Opinion pieces can be submitted to [email protected].

3 replies on “An open, honest and transparent ULP Gov’t! (Pt 1)”

  1. This observation of yours is what is Vincentian Socialism in operation (one rule for them and another rule for us) fool we to have been taken in by their seductive socialist twaddle much to our sad cost. With both hands one could work for the country but equally with both hands one could loot the country’s treasury.

    No different in Cuba, Venezuela or those like them in Africa. “Swiss Bank Socialist” according to Dr George Ayittey. Watch his interview as to “How Socialism Destroyed Africa” Watch again as he explain how it happens

    Loot the treasury and then lobby and argue for Foreign Aid! So let us free St Vincent and the Grenadines too with Applied Economics

    We see the same behaviour in Africa as we we see in SVG where those in power exploits their position over the people and the peoples money.

    Isabel Dos Santos, said to be the wealthiest woman in Africa, is accused of diverting billions of dollars from Angolan state companies during her father Jose Eduardo dos Santos’s near four-decade rule of the oil-rich African nation.

    But how does one make billions of dollars while daddy is in power? Easy! Isabel Dos Santos knows how!


    “Grandson of Fidel Castro shares his life of luxury aboard yachts and more on Instagram”

    Well my dear Ben Z. Comay-Adams as you may have observed, all Vincentians are truly equal sadly though some Vincentians are just more equal than others. Viva La money bags!

  2. This is a difficult article to write because if anyone on Earth is doing something covertly…successfully…we will never find out about it. Remember the “Panama Papers” where many celebrities and politicians were discovered to secretly have many more millions than anyone ever thought? Not to mention that only very few of these “high rollers” were exposed in that scandal.
    Cronyism and nepotism occurs in every government although many governments such as here in SVG it is certainly rampant! Forget the 50% concession a family member got for a venue at the airport, I am sure most everyone that applied got a concession. Nevertheless, it seems obvious that the Prime Minister must really love his “Blood son”, seeing he has bestowed undeniable favoritism upon him, (in the long term this may prove to be a detriment rather than a benifit). I believe most of the country are believing that the son has gotten everything the “easy way” and not really earned it like his father did.
    If the article is about transparency of government; is there really such a thing? What about Dave Ames and others, concerning the secret CBI program? I am sure there are many people that have many questions concerning “transparency” here in SVG.

  3. The writer forgot the question mark in the title of the article. That would have have given a more appropriate perspective on the article and forced him to view the supportive points he referenced from a very different angle

Comments closed.