Advertisement 87
Advertisement 323
The defendant, Carleyann Harris, leaves the Kingstown Magistrate's Court after her sentencing on Monday. (iWN photo)
The defendant, Carleyann Harris, leaves the Kingstown Magistrate’s Court after her sentencing on Monday. (iWN photo)
Advertisement 219

A Bequia woman cried, but was deemed unremorseful, as she told the Kingstown Magistrate’s Court, on Monday, that she stole EC$6,100 from her boyfriend last week because he had pressured her to have an abortion in November.

Carleyann Harris, 30, the mother of 13-, 12-, and 4-year-old children, pleaded guilty to a charge that between March 15 and 19, at Retreat, Vermont, she stole EC$6,100.

The money was the property of her then boyfriend, Carlos Ollivierre, a 31-year-old bus conductor of Retreat, Vermont.

The facts of the case are that Harris and Ollivierre were in a visiting relationship for the past five months and she would stay at his home from time to time.

Last week Tuesday, about 5:50 a.m., Ollivierre placed the money in a sock which he put in a hat and left it at his home and went to work.

Advertisement 21

Harris was at Ollivierre’s home at that time.

Ollivierre did not check on the money again until about 6:30 a.m. on Friday, when he discovered that it was missing.

He reported the matter to the Vermont Police Station which, in turn, informed police in Bequia.

Police in Bequia arrested Harris and handed her over to their colleagues in Vermont. Harris handed over to the police EC$1,680 in cash along with one pack of synthetic hair, and a foot file.

The value of the cash and the items recovered was EC$1,714.95.

In mitigation, Harris told the court that she has been working with the government as a janitor for the past 10 years and is paid EC$500 a month.

She said that last November, she found out that she was pregnant with Ollivierre’s child and he told her that he did not want the child and asked her to take an abortion.

Ollivierre is not the father of any of Harris’ children.

Harris said that she told Ollivierre that in her family they do not have abortions. She, however, at his insistence, underwent the procedure.

She said that, on one occasion, she and her 4-year-old son went to Ollivierre’s house to spend some time.

She said that Ollivierre “threatened the child”, who she described as “mouthy” and would say anything that comes to his mouth.

She said that Ollivierre told her son that he was going to be “a girl, he was going to be a buller man” (gay).

Harris told the court it was very disrespectful for Ollivierre, who she noted is 31 years old, to be saying those things to a 4-year-old child.

She said that Ollivierre choked and slapped her and said that women like she are only good for sex.

Harris said that she remembered those words because all of her life she was bullied.

“I didn’t know how love really felt until the day I gave birth to my three kids,” she said, adding that when she met Ollivierre she thought that he would have treated her differently.

“I just went to the extreme,” the woman told the court.

Harris said she chanced upon the money while packing away Ollivierre’s clothes one day and when she took the cash she was not thinking.

Senior Magistrate Rickie Burnett told Harris that she had caused herself and her children much embarrassment by her actions.

Asked if he had anything to say to the court, Ollivierre said “not really”.

In her comments, the prosecutor, acting Corporal of Police Corlene Samuel told the court that while she had heard Harris’ allegation, she did not see the link between them and her crime.

“The things were hurtful,” Samuel commented, adding that there are places, such as the Social Services Department, to which Harris could have gone to get help.

Harris told the court that after taking the money, she stayed in Kingstown and was drinking, and that this is how she spent the $4,420 that was not recovered.

“And how many children she say she have?” Samuel commented quizzically.

The magistrate, for his part, said that he had promised the Lord to be extra careful in his comment this week.

“In a day? That is hard to believe,” Samuel said. “She is trying to get sympathy from the court but this is hard to believe.”

The prosecutor said that while she is not a drinker, she knows that beers are four for $10.

Ollivierre told the court that he wanted back his money, adding that some of it belongs to his mother.

“Ms Harris, you have to compensate the complainant. Put another way, you have to pay him every cent back. If you don’t, it will be prison for you,” Burnett said.

Ollivierre told the court that Harris had given his brother’s girlfriend EC$500 from the money.

However, the woman snapped at him, saying that she never gave the woman $500. She said that her aunt had sent her money and she gave Ollivierre’s brother’s girlfriend $300 and $200 for something else but that the funds did not come from the stolen money.

The senior magistrate said that based on Harris’ interaction with the court, she had no remorse at all for what she had done.

Ollivierre asked the court to give Harris time to repay the money, saying he would not want to see her go to prison.  He suggested that she be given four months.

However, Burnett ordered Harris to pay Ollivierre compensation in the sum of EC$4,420 in three months — by June 30 — or go to prison for six months.

He also bonded her for six months in the sum of EC$1,500 forthwith or three months in prison. 

5 replies on “Woman steals $6,100 from boyfriend after forced abortion”

  1. Hashtag Prince says:

    Quite unfair judgement I would say. This man literally abused the woman and her child, he took advantage of her. The remorse to be shown was already seen BY HIM – not the woman – when he stated “did not want to see her to go to prison”, because he already suffered inner conviction of how he was treating her and her child. Taking the money, though not right, was her knee-jerk reaction to how she was treated. This is why more leniency should have been administered. Nobody addressed this man’s attitude and treatment towards the woman, and the same behaviour was executed in the court. The magistrate had a duty to at least scold that man. The prosecutor seemed to have understood but was more concerned in getting her “win”. Sad times we living in. NO MERCY, NO MERIT! ” If Salvation was a thing that money could buy, the rich would live and the poor would die!”

  2. Human Rights Advocate says:

    This makes no sense to me…..I have been reading all of Ricky Burnette’s cases and he seems to be harder and harsher on the vulnerable, poor, abused and at risk people and seems to be lenient on the cases which are more life threatening….the muderers and killer instinct people seem to be getting away scotch free and given a better chance to life by sending them back in the system to work, who continue to drive fear and threaten the livlihoods of vincentians…..what kind of judge is he? its no wonder Vincentians can’t sleep at nights…..and when they put them back in the government entities to work…..they find themselves in people homes, who are unsuspecting of them!!!!!

    This judicial system needs to rip down!!!!

  3. The woman is right to take the money. If a man going with a woman who already has three children then all is fair. You can’t expect to get a free ride and avoid all responsibility. And then you have the gall to go to the police on the woman. Where were the cops when he was sleeping with her? Courts in SVG is a joke, the unconscionable magistrate must have wanted a piece too?

  4. Yes she stole but the magistrate is heartless. Even the worthless plaintiff showed some heart. These men are NOTHING.

  5. A man xxx with a 3x mother for a long period and after he made her have an abortion continued xxx her as usual. The woman leaves with the man’s treasure. Surprised? Now that is a smart girl.

Comments closed.