Advertisement 87
Advertisement 211
CEO of VINLEC, Thornley Myers. (iWN file photo)
CEO of VINLEC, Thornley Myers. (iWN file photo)
Advertisement 219

Chief executive officer of electricity company, VINLEC, Thornley Myers, has defended the integrity of the company and its staff, amidst complaints by customers about unusually high electricity bills in April.

He told a press conference on Friday, that because of the explosive eruption of La Soufriere, some customers received estimated bills and others were billed for more days than the usual billing period.

Myers, however, said that once electricity meters are actually read, customers’ accounts will be regularised.

“What you are guaranteed is that when the metre is actually read, your consumption is noted and you receive an accurate bill. I want to make that absolutely clear. In this company, there is no desire, there is no wish, there is no expectation by any of us that we should do that which is not right,” Myers told the media.

“And our customers should not be fearful, be concerned that as an entity, we are involved in unsavoury practices. That has not been the history, the tradition of this company. This unfortunate period that we are going through here has forced us into a position where we have to estimate a significant number of our customers.”

Advertisement 21

Myers said that VINLEC has about 46,000 customers across the country and monthly, nine meter readers provide meter readings for billing.

In normal circumstances, this is a fairly tight-schedule that begins on the first day of the month and ends two to three days before the end of the month.

Meter reading began on April 1, but was interrupted by the Easter holiday of April 2 to 5. 

“No sooner had we recommenced, of course, we had the explosive eruption of the volcano on the 9th,” Myers said, adding that the week immediately following the initial eruption was difficult for everyone.

“Our meter readers, essentially, travel by foot, to every single meter and it became extremely difficult for them to traverse the country doing meter readings.”

He said that the eruption resulted in significant delay in the reading of meters, which eventually had to be halted.

When the meter readings recommenced, the company tried to read as many  meters as possible, Myers said.

He said that during this period, there were meters that were due to be read, as the company bills its customers every 30 to 33 days.

Myers said that the delay resulted in about 15,000 customers receiving a bill for a period of 34 to 43 days.

He said that customers who received a bill for approximately 40 days will receive one for 20 to 22 days in the next billing cycle.

However, notwithstanding the company’s aggressive meter reading after the initial eruption of the volcano, it ran out of time, and had to estimate consumption for about 6,000 customers.

This estimate was based on the average daily consumption for the previous three months.

“Naturally, you may not be at home, you may not use the electricity in the same manner in which you used it in the previous three months, and it is possible that that estimate may be lower or higher than the electricity that you would normally use,” Myers said.

“So that over the two month period, you would have a meter reading that will show your actual consumption over that two-month period and you would then  get an accurate reading to reflect your consumption. So, for this month’s bill, you are likely to see a higher consumption because the estimated meter reading was done over a longer period.”

Myers said that the issues with reading meters are compounded by the fact that, in April, the fuel surcharge was a little higher than the previous month.

“We want to assure our customers that this is nothing unusual in the electricity business and there are many utilities in our region that do not do a meter reading every month but they provide their customers with a bill every month. Some do it every other month; some do it quarterly,” he said.

“For those who have higher billing periods or estimates with higher than normal billing periods, I want to assure you, in the next month, your billing period will be much less.”

Myers said that for April, 20,000 customers will receive a bill with a billing period of 32 days or less — a normal billing period.

Myers said that VINLEC is owned by the people of St. Vincent and the Grenadines and is managed by Vincentians.

“All of us come from the bowels of Vincentians. None of us have been born with riches; we have struggled to get to where we are and we have deep and abiding interests not only in our jobs but in doing what is right, what is right for the company, what is right for the country,” he said.

“There is no interest, whatsoever, on the part of any individuals in this company to do anything to hurt our citizens. This is our country; this is our home. We won’t always get it right – that is for sure but it is not within our interest to do something that hurts, that pressures, that makes lives difficult for our citizens; it is not.

“Please accept, in this case, we are reaching out to you; please accept what we are saying has happened here, and we hope that you would understand it and we can essentially move forward as a company. We all have to protect our company. We know we are in difficult times, but there are certain realities that we have to face.” 

7 replies on “CEO defends VINLEC amidst billing saga”

  1. In today’s world we do have smart meters and technology. Why estimate consumption in a time like this.

  2. I don’t accept that crap that vinlec manager gives,,very lame excuses,,vinlec been robbing people a long time now,,they still charge poor people thousand of dollars for a pole to get connected,, they never give bk anything to vincentions,even at Christmas no incentive on the bill to encourage lighting for the kids,
    Why couldn’t vinlec cancelled the bills because of the volcano eruptions??? No instead they rob u!
    No empathy for the strugglers
    I only rate the vinlec workers in the field,,very reliable and hard working.
    Management prospective,, they robbing vincentions through fuel charge and over billing.

  3. So why they did not charge less based on the estimation of at least the 3 or last reading. Then when they are able to make visits and customers get the actual reading they charge what what the right amount which could be more or less… This is utter fart

  4. Sorry CUZ! I don’t believe anything you are saying. You should not charge folks money based on your assumptions. Read the damn meter and if it shows 10, 100 or what, then that’s what the home owner should pay. I’ve always said VINLEC is a Ponzi scheme business and this eruption issue shows that.

  5. Any one who trust vinlec need their brain’s tested this is an ongoing thing for those who don’t know

Comments closed.