Advertisement 87
Advertisement 323
Policing social media
Advertisement 219

The Cybercrime bill that is before Parliament is “absolutely not” intended to police social media as some persons have claimed, says Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves.

There have been concerns about the intention of the bill introduced in Parliament last week and sent to a select committee for review and consultation.

Among other things, the bill creates offences relating to cyber harassment and bullying, illegal accessing and remaining in a computer system, as well as illegal interception, acquisition or interference of computer data.

It also introduces identify-related crimes, computer-related forgery and fraud, violation of privacy and child pornography offences.

If the bill is passed into law, persons convicted of offences under the bill can be fined as much as EC$200,000 and jailed for up to 20 years.

Advertisement 21

But there have been concerns about certain elements of the bill, which some persons, including political activists opposed to the government, say are intended to silence critics of the government who use the Internet to engage in their activism.

At a media briefing this week, Gonsalves, who is also Minister of Legal Affairs, rejected that suggestion, telling reporters that the bill is a regional one that is being adapted to local circumstances.

He said his government has in fact redrafted a section of the bill that gave some “difficulties” in Grenada and resulted in protest by Caribbean media houses.

Gonsalves said that St. Vincent and the Grenadines is ranked highly among the freest countries in the world in terms of press freedom.

“This is a country with a free media and we intend to have it so. But nobody can reasonably doubt that there are problems with the growth of the technology that you have … and things which should be regulated for which there should be a criminal sanction,” he said.

Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves, left, and Minister of Technology, Camillo Gonsalves at Tuesday's press conference. (Photo: API)
Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves, left, and Minister of Technology, Camillo Gonsalves at Tuesday’s press conference. (Photo: API)

“It always happens with technology,” Gonsalves said, adding that before the invention of gunpowder, possession of illegal firearm or ammunition was not an offence.

“Technologies bring other offences. It is in the nature of life,” he said.

He said that in the United States, it is a criminal offence to make a threatening post about a public official, but said that is not included in the Cyber Crime Bill.

“Look. There’s a different thing between freedom and licence. And, emphatically, this is not about anything about controlling social media or any sort of thing.

“I accept that the nature of social media is that you are going to have people saying some quite outrageous things and may coarsen the nature of the conversation, but there are series of ways of dealing with that and in absolutely no way is this bill intended to be a jackhammer on people, quote-unquote freedom.

“It is a matter of how do you balance things, how do you function in an orderly society,” Gonsalves said, and invited people to read the bill.

Speaking at the same press conference, Minister of Telecommunication, Camillo Gonsalves said the original draft of the Cyber Crime Bill was generated outside of SVG.

“The bill was drafted and provided to the OECS and then we refined the bill. And the drafters have refined what was given to them, it has gone through a process of revision, that is what came to the Parliament, and now, there is an additional process of revision from the Parliament to the final product.”

Camillo said that the government has learnt from the experiences of countries that have already implemented the legislation, such as Grenada.

“But I want to stress. Read this bill and look at what this bill is targeting. Don’t let people who have political axes to grind distort what this bill is about.

“This bill is about protecting your children from child pornography. Is there politics in that? This bill is about stopping somebody from luring your son or daughter into some dark alley to do whatever, using the Internet for those purposes. This bill is to stop somebody from using the Internet to break into your cell phone and your compute and using your data. This bill is to stop scams, where somebody will email you and tell you you’ve won a million dollars or there is a million in oil money somewhere.”

Camillo said none of these things are currently defined as crimes in SVG.

“And, yes, there are elements in the bill talking about making threats to people, about defaming people, about telling lies about people on the Internet. There is something in there about cyber bullying,” he said, adding that children in the United States, the United Kingdom and Europe have killed themselves because they are bullied and harassed by their peers.

“Must we not do something to protect them? We have children who are living their lives online now, on social media and there is no system of protection for these children.”

Camillo said he is not saying that a reasonable mind cannot conclude that the government might have gone too far on some elements of the bill.

“But what this bill is about is protecting people. … We didn’t introduce it after the election or any of these gimmicks that people talk about.

“Read about this bill. It has a long history in the region. It has a long history outside of the region when cyber crime legislation is being passed. It is an important bill because all of us are living more of our lives online and we have to be protected when we live our lives online.”

The bill will create a number of offences related to the use of information communication technology.
The bill will create a number of offences related to the use of information communication technology.

Camillo said he and the prime minister are happy to hear the feedback on the bill.

“We want to have the best possible bill … but don’t just shoot little pot shots and inflate yourself so much to think that you are so important that the government drafter sat down and drafted a 40-page bill to get you because you are in your bathroom or your bedroom somewhere in another country writing tweets about something in the government. You are not that important.

“What we are trying to do is protect children, we are trying to protect consumers, we are trying to protect business houses. We are trying to make cyber space, which is a dangerous place, as safe as possible. That’s what this bill is about and I hope that people who comment on it and engage in it engage from that perspective.”

Camillo said he noticed that there is an entity that is going to have a consultation on the bill on Friday.

The secretary of the body is a Member of Parliament who hasn’t seen it fit to come to Parliament or attend the select committee meeting to discuss the bill, he said.

“But they want to discuss the bill in another venue and the entity that is having the discussion has not invited me as the Minister of Telecoms, had not invited the Minister of Legal Affairs, has not invited somebody from the Ministry of Technology, has not invited somebody from the Attorney General’s Chambers, so it already tells you the kind of conversation they want to have on the document,” Camillo said.

“I want us to have a reasonable, rational conversation and I want us to have the best bill. I ain’t draft the bill. So, it is not that I am wedded to any word or words in the bill. But we need a bill that protects Vincentians online. And cyberspace is the new space that we all occupy. And there are no laws currently in St. Vincent that protect people in cyber space and that is what this bill is about. It is not about politics, at all,” he said.

5 replies on “Cyber crime bill ‘absolutely not’ intended to police social media — PM”

  1. SVG has so many more pressing issues such as the economy which is in crisis( but according to you its on the rebound..Lmao) major crime situation etc, but your talking bout Cyber Laws. This hold Cyber Bill is nothing more than you trying to silence the people of SVG and Vincentian abroad ( fool talk but fool not listening) SVG is login behind other Caribbean Nations in more than one way( things so bad your Econmic Minister is heard begging people for clothes to give to Vincentian( shame) go and fix the mess you have created in SVG, then take your three and go.

  2. C. ben-David says:

    “Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way round, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise.”
    ? Adolf Hitler

  3. Brown Boy USA says:

    You mean to tell me that for cyber bullying a person can get up to 20 years in prison and for killing a man they can get much less than that? Then it’s better you kill the man instead of bullying him online! No wonder crime is so rampant is this country. Why not make stiffer laws for illegal possession of firm arms and make that offense punishable up to 20 years as well? How about the other areas of crime that are being perpetuated on our people on a daily basis: rape, theft and the like? These, include killings, are what plaguing the lives of our society daily, especially the poor. By the way, the poor and so called middle class people in this country can’t even afford to pay their electricity bill much more to purchase computer and pay for internet. The folks who can afford to do so are the upper class in SVG and those who are assisted by their people overseas, because even the so called middle class are catching their nen-nen in this country. Therefore, to me, this bill is nothing more than to police social media and silence the voices of those who wishes to express their God given rights on the affairs of our country. Think about it, you nah foolish eh, are you? Look at where their priority lies!

    1. You are only scratching the surface. The problems in SVG are far more and much worse but the government does not seem to think they are serious. First we have to get the police to actually address crime, even if it comes in the middle of a dominos match, even if it involves a ULP supporter or a wealthy person, or a poor one.

Comments closed.