Advertisement 87
Advertisement 323
Signs in East Harlem, New York, an area with a high Hispanic population ask voters not to vote for Republican candidate Donald Trump. Credit: Lyndal Rowlands/IPS.
Signs in East Harlem, New York, an area with a high Hispanic population ask voters not to vote for Republican candidate Donald Trump. Credit: Lyndal Rowlands/IPS.
Advertisement 219

by Lyndal Rowlands

NEW YORK, Nov. 8 (IPS) — Long lines were reported throughout the country on Tuesday as U.S. voters headed to the polls in one of the most polarised elections in living memory.

In one voting location in Cincinnati, Ohio as many as 4,000 people stood in a line over half a mile long waiting to vote, according to Twitter user Saahil Desai.

High voter turnout should be considered as a public good, Massimo Tommasoli Permanent Observer for International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) to the UN told IPS.

“In general, it is a public good to have a high level of participation because normally this is something that reflects higher levels of inclusion, it addresses typical exclusion, segmentation of a country,” although he noted that it is not always a priority for politicians who would rather focus on inspiring their own supporters to vote.

Advertisement 271

The closeness of the 2016 US Presidential election has sparked questions about electoral integrity and voter participation.

One way that electoral integrity can be assured is through international observation.

The 2016 US Presidential election is being observed by an international Election Observation Mission from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.

However, although the U.S. government invited the international observation mission, 13 U.S. states — Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia — explicitly forbid international observers.

One of these states, North Carolina – a so-called “swing state”, has been the subject of particular scrutiny in the days leading up to the election.

On Thursday, Nov. 11, a federal judge issued a restraining order to stop state and county election boards in North Carolina from “mass purging” voters from its electoral rolls.

The mass purging had begun after electoral boards began illegally removing voters from the roll after a single letter from their home address was returned to sender.

The court challenge was bought by the North Carolina National Association for the Advancement of Colored People which said that: “en masse voter challenges in Beaufort County have disproportionately targeted African American voters, who comprise only 25.9 per cent of the Beaufort County population, but account for more than 65 per cent (91 of 138) of the challenges.”

“The NAACP is defending rights of all North Carolinians to participate in this election and we will not back down and allow this suppression to continue,” said the Reverend William Barber II, president of the North Carolina NAACP in a statement.

Considering that the U.S. Presidential election between Republican George Bush and Democrat Al Gore in the year 2000 was decided by a margin of only 537 votes in Bush’s favour in the State of Florida, even small changes in state election rules and regulations could potentially have a significant impact.

Another way that participation in US elections is limited is through voter ID laws.

“The issue of ID requirements is a highly political issue in the U.S.,” noted Tommasoli. The requirements are considered to “disenfranchise voters especially the poor or minorities that do not have … access to ID”.

Stricter voter ID laws are usually favoured by Republicans or conservatives, he said, noting that other elements of a working electoral system include voter registration and voter education.

Motivating young voters to vote for the first time is extremely important as this may determine their voting patterns for the rest of their lives:

“If you do not vote when you reach voting age it is highly unlikely that you will vote (later).”

Overall, Tommasoli said that “voter turnout in the U.S. is traditionally very low compared to other countries” but that Tuesday may bring a higher turnout than usual due to the polarisation of the election.

The United States Election Project predicted Monday that 135 million people would vote in the 2016 election, higher than the 2008 election when President Barack Obama was first elected.

One reply on “High voter turnout at US elections a ‘public good’”

  1. What “high voter turnout?” Preliminary estimates are that 55.6 percent of eligible voters cast a ballot, the lowest in 12 years.

    Those who are crying about the Trump win but did not vote — a disproportionate number of visible minority and low-income people — are crying over their own spilt milk. Sod them, is my reply.

    Regardless of which party Americans supported, there was only one clear winner, electoral democracy itself.

Comments closed.