Advertisement 87
Advertisement 211
Start at Argyle
Advertisement 219

By Kenton X. Chance

Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves, on Friday, found himself on the defensive, trying to convince a radio audience that he and his Unity Labour Party (ULP) administration did not contribute to the politicisation of the construction of the Argyle International Airport.

The EC$700 million airport, which has contributed EC$400 million to the national debt, began operating on Feb. 14, six years behind schedule.

Speaking on Boom FM on Friday, Gonsalves said it was the opposition New Democratic Party (NDP) or their “surrogates” that “made partisan politics out of” the airport by attacking it “at every single turn”.

Ralph Gonsalves
Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves says “absolutely not” did he contribute to the politicisation of the airport. (iWN file photo)

But that same morning, one local newspaper published a commentary by a member of Gonsalves’ ULP, who, in his weekly column, put some of the blame squarely at the feet of the party and the ULP administration.

Advertisement 271
WhatsApp icon
If you wish to receive iWN updates by WhatsApp, please add +1-784-532-4252… Be sure to send us a message when you do. “Notification” and the name you would like us to add you as would suffice…

“In conception and delivery, the ULP also tagged this national project with a heavy-handed party presence,” speaker of the House of Assembly, Jomo Thomas, a former ULP senator, wrote in his “Plain Talk” column in The Vincentian newspaper.

“From the ‘who e hut e hut’ parade of heavy equipment through the streets, to the massive star at the entrance to the airport tower, to the huge ULP flag at the official opening, the party has acted as though the airport belongs to its supporters rather than the people of SVG whose money it was spending for the construction,” wrote Thomas, who was a candidate for the ULP in the December 2015 general elections, but who has always given critical support to the party.

The prime minister’s comments came as he discussed last Thursday’s removal of a large star — the symbol of the ULP — which was cast in concrete near the control tower, one day before the airport was commissioned on Feb. 13.

Gonsalves had said from inception that it was wrong for the star to have been built there.

Argyle International Airport. (iWN photo)

Responding to a question from iWitness News on Monday, he told a press conference that he had ordered that it be removed.

Gonsalves said on radio, on Friday, that he cared to find out who gave instructions for the star to be placed near the control tower, but said there are some things that people don’t find out.

“What I was more interested in, frankly speaking, was just concrete it over,” he said, referring to the process through which the star was eliminated.

During his radio appearance, Gonsalves, at one point, seemed to be attempting to equate the star with the “key” — the symbol of the NDP — that was formed by the design of the area where the plaque near the terminal building is located.

The “key” being discernible when viewed from a bird’s eye perspective.

He, however, admitted that the “key” was not deliberately created, adding, “But the point I am saying is this: people read things more than what they should read in certain matters.”

Star removed
The star was removed on Thursday. (iWN photo)

Gonsalves first announced the construction of the airport in August 2005 — four months before he announced a general election — in a speech he concluded by saying: “All this is realisable only with the ULP government. Without us, there will be no international airport. Only the ULP administration can deliver this. It is all so crystal clear. Let us face it: Which government, other than that of the ULP, can put together a “coalition of the willing” consisting of Cuba, Venezuela, Canada, Mexico, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, to construct the international airport? Which other leadership can do it but the current leadership in the ULP administration? Today, marks the beginning of another chapter of immense achievement for our blessed homeland.”

In his comments on radio on Friday, Gonsalves said, “I began this project in a national focus. And I end it in a national focus, the operation and construction.

“The opposition is the one who made partisan politics out of it — attack it at every single turn and still trying underneath to see what they can do, with their — the opposition or people who are their surrogates and who are acting on their behalf, still trying to play their petty politics. And I have been on it, national at the beginning and national at the end.”

But asked about the red flags that were flown from the equipment as they were driven from Campden Park to Argyle ahead of the commencement of construction of the airport in 2008, Gonsalves said they were to indicate the presence of a hazard.

“When you are transporting equipment, even one piece of equipment, don’t you have a red flag on it signalling danger?” he said, adding that 37 pieces of equipment were transported in the convoy and some of them had flags at the back, some at the front, and some on both ends.

The convoy of equipment also had police escorts.

“Why you didn’t say that the equipment were yellow?” the prime minister said of the colour of the equipment – which is also the colour of the NDP.

We dress like he say1
Many interpreted the red flag on the equipment as the ULP’s colour rather than any warning. (Photo: Patrick Ferrari)

But while Gonsalves’ explanation of the flags might find reason with some persons, it might be more difficult for him to explain away the playing of soca artiste Delroy “Fireman” Hooper’s “Who e hut e hut” during the transportation of the equipment, which occurred during work hours — possibly for maximum visual effect.

It was also pointed out to Gonsalves that ULP campaign stickers were placed on some of the equipment while they were in use during the construction of the airport.

“Don’t carry me places where an individual may do things which doesn’t have any  — the Argyle International Airport, at one point or the other, has 400 and something people employed. At the height of an election campaign, you may have one or two of them which decided that they are going to put sticker on what they are driving. The point about it is that’s not a government policy. That’s not AIDC policy,” Gonsalves said.

But the stickers remained on the equipment long after the election campaign and even to the very opening of the airport.

In further presenting his case that it was the opposition that politicised the airport, Gonsalves said that the opposition had accused him of being “crazy” in his pursuit of the project.

But Gonsalves has proudly and repeatedly related to the nation that Chavez had said that he (Gonsalves) was “loco” — Spanish for “crazy” — when he (Gonsalves) told him (Chavez) about his plan to build the airport at Argyle.

And while Caracas has provided one-third of the loans taken to build the airport, it has not followed through on what Gonsalves has said was its promise to pay the salaries and wages of the Cuban workers at the airport.

Ralph Flag
Gonsalves waves a red flag when construction of the airport began.

Gonsalves also defended his waving of a red flag when commencement of construction of the airport began, saying that the date, Aug. 13, 2008, was Fidel Castro’s birthday and also the birthday of Sir Vincent Beache, former minister of national security and director of the state-owned company that built the airport.

“Now, let me say this to you: without Fidel and Chavez and President Chen [Shui-bian] and the Taiwanese and Patrick Manning, to a lesser degree, that airport will not be there.

“So I know what was involved. So, from the very beginning, the NDP and continuing throughout until they changed their minds the Saturday before the Wednesday election in 2010, and immediately after, went back into attack mode. They opposed me getting the money in parliament.”

Gonsalves said that “absolutely not” did he help to fuel some of the division surrounding the airport.

ULP campaign paraphernalia were widespread on equipment used at the airport. (iWN photo)

“You see, what happened is this: these fellows opposed it all the time, and, at the end, when it is successful, they say it’s national. But it was national for me from the beginning; national from the beginning, national to the end. Absolutely, no doubt in my mind about that.”

In his newspaper column, Thomas was also critical of the opposition, saying that NDP founder, Sir James Mitchell, told the party that if Gonsalves finished the airport, they could forget victory for a few electoral cycles.

“The NDP bought into this non-scientific view, obstructed at every turn, refused to vote monies for the project, only for the leader to make the ridiculous claim in parliament that his party always supported the construction of the airport,” Thomas wrote.

7 replies on “PM goes defensive amidst Argyle Airport politicisation claims”

  1. After the Watergate Affair President Nixon stated it is not the act that gets you in trouble it is the cover-up. Our PM stating that not he nor his party politicized the airport construction shows us his complete lack of integrity. He is getting too smug in his belief that he can fool all the people all the time, when he can’t even fool his most loyal supporters with this one.

    After our PM talks like this it is amazing that any ULP official can show their face in public let lone support such a man. Great respect for Jomo Thomas he is certainly the most honest out of the bunch. As Jomo gets better and better, my respect for him grows. The comrade can’t have people in his party that “outshine” him so we may see them find a way to get rid of Jomo.

  2. It may be true that the NDP did not vote in favor of financing this airport. What is NEVER stated is that NDP, and Green party DID support the building of an airport. They just did not support the way THIS airport was being built. Ivan O’Neal wanted it built in a different area of Argyle, facing the right direction without danger of water softening the runway, and of course in a different way altogether. I may add both NDP and Green Party had a problem with WHEN! You will see in past newspapers that officials in the NDP stated that after the Financial Collapse the airport should have been either delayed or built in stages instead of squeezing the people for every last cent, for the glory of the comrade..
    So, this proves that Jomo’s statement is certainly inaccurate. His remarks are merely “overzealous”.

  3. PM Gonsalves and the ULP will have to eat this Argyle fiasco for breakfast lunch and dinner right into the grave. So that being the case can he now turn around and deny the inevitable? Comrade the airport is a ULP “thing” from beginning, and it will be ULP to the end, so fest up and own up.
    Moreover, Jomo’s remark that “In conception and delivery, the ULP also tagged this national project with a heavy-handed party presence…” is plain rubbish. Jomo the now become national embarrassment and a total idiot doesn’t know what he’s talking about. We know how this project unfolded took on and became a partisan project. “The opposition is the one who made partisan politics out of it — attack it at every single turn…” So the ULP had to embrace it, and rightly so, and all those who supported it as “our ULP” airport. Chewps! Jomo should resign from the party. Seriously.

    1. Vinciman, what many of us fail to realize, especially ULP supporters, is not that the NDP did not supported having an international airport but the concept, location and the manner in which the project was being done. You will remember, and even the PM mentioned it, that the concept of the airport was basis of an NDP study into construction an international airport. And the NDP did vote in parliament to fund the project, because they realized project had already started and too big to fail. Now that the airport has been built and in operation, we should be looking ahead to overcome the challenges and ensure that it succeed instead of constantly pointing fingers. Also, I see no need for Jomo to resign. We need some checks and balances to government and we need persons like Jomo perspectives ensure our democracy is preserved.

  4. From conception to finish, this project has been highly political and fan fared as solely ULP. And for the PM now to place blame on the opposition is completely, in his word: foolishness! Why can’t he take responsibility for anything? He’s always blaming others, like he could not do no wrong. Just say it was portrayed as a labor project…what the heck, we all know it was…it not like it really matters anyway. The AIA is built and in operation. You don’t want to continue to point fingers at the opposition. Instead, try to mend that divide and try to work collectively to ensure the damn thing succeed. We are not stupid, we know what it is, so let us just move on as one people and make sure the AIA works because if it fails, all of us fail.

  5. Patrick Ferrari says:

    Excerpts from

    Pathological lying (also called pseudologia fantastica and mythomania) is a behavior of habitual or compulsive lying.[1][2] It was first described in the medical literature in 1891 by Anton Delbrueck.[2] Although it is a controversial topic,[2] pathological lying has been defined as “falsification entirely disproportionate to any discernible end in view, may be extensive and very complicated, and may manifest over a period of years or even a lifetime”.[1] The individual may be aware they are lying, or may believe they are telling the truth.
    • The stories told are usually dazzling or fantastical, but never breach the limits of plausibility, which is key to the pathological liar’s tactic. The tales are not a manifestation of delusion or some broader type of psychosis—on confrontation, the teller can admit they are untrue, even if unwillingly.
    • The stories told tend toward presenting the liar favorably.

Comments closed.