Advertisement 211
Xyaire Howard will spend 31 years in prison while his girlfriend, Chelsea Grant was sentenced to 15 years. (Photos: UK Met Police)
Xyaire Howard will spend 31 years in prison while his girlfriend, Chelsea Grant was sentenced to 15 years. (Photos: UK Met Police)
Advertisement 219

Xyaire Howard, the 24-year-old Vincentian man who murdered a 71-year-old woman in London in September 2022, has jailed been for life with a minimum term of 31 years for his crime.

His girlfriend, Chelsea Grant, 28, also a Vincentian, and Howard spent over 13,000 pounds of Susan Hawkey’s money after Howard killed her.

Grant will spend 15 years in prison for three robberies against Hawkey and one attempted robbery, SkyNews reported.

In handing down the sentence in London today (Wednesday) Judge Judy Khan KC said the couple were motivated by “greed and dishonesty and had “terrorised” Hawkey and subjected her to “humiliation and degradation” to get access to her money.

After Hawley’s nmurder the couple made  146 transactions totalling some £13,000 with the slain pensioner’s bank car.

Advertisement 21

They purchased luxury items, including perfume, a new television, portable speakers, telephones, clothes, shoes, sunglasses, watches and handbags.

Hawkey’s bank account went from a balance of more than 16,000   to just 3,434.03 pounds, the prosecution said.

In October, Howard was convicted for murder while Grant was freed of that charge after  a trial in which they blamed each other for the killing.

Howard and Grant each pleaded guilty to two counts of fraud, and were convicted of one count of attempted robbery.

Grant was convicted of three counts of robbery while Howard was convicted of one charge of robbery.

Howard admitted a second count of robbery and was cleared of a third.

Police found next to the murdered woman’s body a condom containing both Howard’s semen and Grant’s DNA.

However, Grant told the court her DNA was on the condom because she and Howard had sex regularly and he never showered.

Howard admitted tying Hawkey up with tape but said he left her alive and well.

Grant became pregnant with Howard’s child during the time they were preying on Hawkey and she gave birth to a baby boy while in custody in May.

The trial heard that the couple had first robbed Hawkey in the street then continued to prey on her in her home before Howard tied her up with tape and his shoelaces and forced her to give him her PIN number.

He then strangled her to death with another shoelace and left her body in her home to rot while he and Grant went on a shopping spree, spending over three weeks the 13,000 pounds that their victim had in her bank account.

The accused both denied the murder charge but a jury convicted Howard after the trial.

“After the defendants had obtained both her debit card and her PIN, they went on a spending spree, spending thousands of pounds on luxury goods for themselves, including perfume, designer goods, a new television, portable speakers, telephones and accessories, clothing, shoes, sunglasses, watches and handbags,” the prosecutor, Prosecutor Annabel Darlow told the court.

Howard and Grant made 146 different transactions with Hawkey’s card.

By Sept. 19, there were Google searches on Grant’s phone for “decomposition scent”, “how long does a dead body smell”, “How do neighbours smell dead bodies through entire walls from outside and in other houses?” and “Is a dead body a very strong smell”.

She told the court that Howard had made some of these searches.

The trial further heard that on Sept. 22, Howard searched the internet for safety coveralls, Hazmat coveralls and full protective respirator masks.

Hawkey’s body was discovered on Sept. 26 when a concerned neighbour noticed she had not put her bins out.

Police found Hawkey’s body lying on a sofa underneath a duvet. She had been bound, blindfolded with tape and still had a shoelace around her neck.

“All of her lower clothing, that is her trousers and underwear had been removed — all she was wearing was a top and that top had been cut down the front,” the prosecutor said.

“An item of clothing had been placed over her head and her body was under a duvet that was found over her corpse.

“A used condom was found which contained Mr. Howard’s semen and cellular material from Ms Grant –and that was found in the same room as her body together with an opened condom wrapper which bore Mr. Howard’s finger prints,” Darlow told the jury.

“The ligature around Ms Hawkey’s neck had been tightened with sufficient force to break one of the bones in her neck.

“She was strangled by one of these defendants in an attack motivated purely by greed and self interest.

“They wanted to stop Ms Hawkey so they could spend her money at will. They wanted to stop Ms Hawkey ringing the police,” the prosecutor said.

Police arrested Howard and Grant outside a store where the murdered woman’s card was repeatedly used. They were waiting for a bus at the time.

Grant had Hawkey’s card and 1,600 in cash and at her home, police found a laptop computer that had been stolen from the care home where Grant was working.

Before the crime, Grant and Howard had been living at various addresses and were often thrown out for not paying the rent.

Grant first mugged their victim on July 27 last year, wrenching her bag from her shoulder and the couple knocked her to the ground near her home on Aug. 22.

Grant told the court she was not at the home when her boyfriend killed Hawkey and she did not know if she was dead.

She said her boyfriend had later asked her to stand outside the house and “sniff” to see if she could smell a dead body.

Grant made headlines in St. Vincent in August 2019, when she was convicted of a charge that on Sept. 21, 2018, at Kingstown, she assaulted Angelique Fitzpatrick, of Cane Garden, causing actual bodily harm.

Then Senior Magistrate Rickie Burnett urged her to change her ways before joining the British Navy.

The magistrate told Grant that he initially thought that her pregnancy might have contributed to her actions. “But from what I saw in the courtroom during the trial, I was wrong in that opinion,” Burnett said.

iWitness News understands that Grant’s stint in the Navy might have been affected by an injury that she sustained.

iWitness News was reliably informed that a media worker in St. Vincent filed a report with police in February 2022 after receiving a WhatsApp voice note from Grant containing a perceived threat.

Grant is said to have sent the voice note as she contested the contents of a news article that was unrelated to her.

“… the only thing I saying is–” Grant said and paused as a male voice said, “Watch yo back soldier”.

Grant then laughs and said, “yo cyah tell ye man dem ting dey” and continued to laugh.

This article contains material from a MailOnline article that can be read here.

8 replies on “Vincy couple gets lengthy sentences for murder, robbery of UK pensioner”

  1. Rotten apple another product of the education revolution. Her criminal propensity should have been recorded to avoid an apparent danger to the public and those who have a need to know. In the UK the law is not only be done it is seen to be done as in Regina v Sussex, not in St Vincent.

  2. congrats to Rickie Burnett for doing a bad job and letting this criminal go,
    he need to go and sit down somewhere and let a better person do his job as for these two,
    UK prison will fix them up proper

  3. This criminal behavior was nurtured in St Vincent which has one of the highest crime rate in the world. Why should citizens of the UK pay the price for apparent criminality in St Vincent? However, it’s a catch 22 situation because the vast percentage of the population from st Vincent are decent law abiding citizens.

  4. This is a classical case where the Criminal Justice System has failed the Citizens of the UK and St Vincent. Should Magistrate, Burnett did what he ought to have done ,the 71 year old victim would have been alive today. The murderer would not have been able to immigrate to the UK with a criminal background.

  5. All blame are to be cast on Ricky Burnett. The judge who was so lenient on Grant to the extent he gave her a free pass. Had the Judge let the justice be done and seen to be done, as dictates by R v Sussex, then Grant would have had a criminal record which would have prevented from traveling.

  6. Weĺ he let her go. How in the world did Rickie Burnette knew that that person would have turn out so bad. Everyone needs a chance I’m life.

Comments closed.