Advertisement 328
Advertisement 211
Advertisement 219

Sand mining in St. Vincent at Diamond beach by the Government will sooner than later result in the flooding of adjacent land, some of which is below sea level.

Taking of sand from this area is little more than a criminal act, and will result in destruction of people’s land and property. I have no doubt that the Government is fully aware of the damage they are causing to the environment, and the problems that will undoubtedly appear in the vey near future.

Our beaches are being mined for sand for a variety of uses (aggregate in concrete, fill, etc.). The current practice is very destructive and poorly managed (or unmanaged), because if it was managed properly they would have never started, or would have stopped a long time ago.

This is a global phenomenon but in particular in the Caribbean islands. This theft of beach and dune sand is a direct cause of erosion along the shorelines. It is very damaging to the beach fauna and flora, ruinous to beach aesthetics, and will undoubtedly cause environmental damage to other coastal ecosystems associated with the beach such as lowlands.

Beaches below the high water mark are the property of the government — Crown lands. The sand dunes that have formed over the last thousand years are on land above the high-water-mark are owned by adjacent land owners and not the Government (unless the Government owns the adjacent land).

Advertisement 271

Another major impact of beach sand mining is the loss of protection from storms surges associated with hurricanes and tsunamis.

Some communities affected by the 2004 tsunami in the Indian Ocean had higher storm surges probably due to beach sand mining resulting in fatalities.

Sometimes it is difficult to tell that a beach has been mined. Sand extraction becomes difficult to recognize as the beach readjusts to a new profile after a few storms. But historic accounts of beaches in the Caribbean often reveal that beaches have been narrowed considerably.

Beach and dune mining is particularly senseless in a time of rising sea levels, when sand is sorely needed as a storm energy buffer. Why would you remove nature’s sea defence when the sea levels are due to rise over the next few years. We need more defence, not less.

I can well visualise the whole of the meadows behind the beach and dunes at Diamond becoming sea at some time in the very near future, the few houses built there will be consumed by the sea.

It really is time for property owners to serve notice on the Government to stop such actions, putting them on notice that they will be held fully responsible for any resulting damage in the future or present due to any inundation by sea water.

I would also advise them as a group to take advice from a leading QC such as Sir Henry Ford (of Barbados) on what action they may take and what payments they may expect for the current blighting of their land and property by this criminal and indiscriminate removal and selling of sand at Diamond.

It may also be possible if the government fail to act, to serve a certain type of writ on ministers and managers to cease and desist.

There is a good case for a legal beach sit in, because all beaches are reserved for public use, take your BBQ’s and have prolonged beach parties.

This would be a good opportunity for students to save their country from the current rape and pillage by this Marxist government, that cares nothing for the people or their property.

This should be regarded as an all-party action call. Action is of dire urgency in this matter.

Calling all students, save your country from this rape.

Peter Binose


The opinions presented in this content belong to the author and may not necessarily reflect the perspectives or editorial stance of iWitness News. Opinion pieces can be submitted to [email protected].

2 replies on “Beach, dune sand mining in St. Vincent will result in loss of land, flooding (Opinion)”

  1. You have a point there Peter! Here in Canada and in the US they use sandbags to keep water out of properties. It is also done in other countries, where the water level is rising.

  2. Not here PVPALMER, the government are removing up to 60 big truck loads of sand daily, and that’s just from Diamond beach and dunes.

    They have no regard for peoples property whatsoever. The floods that wiped out many homes in Georgetown a couple of years ago was caused by the government diverting the Rabaca river to make sure that the new Rabaca bridge was not damaged. They sent the problem to Georgetown via the Grand Sable River and others streams and rivulets, whilst the Rabaca dry river remained almost dry during the flooding.

    They need the Rabaca bridge preserved, not so as residents north of the river could pass, but because the government ‘Rabaca stuff’ [a volcanic aggregate use for making concrete and block making] mining is on the North side of the river, and they did not want any stop put to that.

    In both cases Rabaca and Diamond, they are earning huge amounts in cash money, where that goes I have not investigated. But it runs into millions of dollars a year, much in cash.

    They would never give sand bags to protect private property, they do not like private property.

Comments closed.