Advertisement 87
Advertisement 211
Advertisement 219

By *Alicia A. Dells

It was with great pride that I followed the installation ceremony for eminent Caribbean jurist, the Honourable Mr. Justice Adrian Saunders to the post of president of the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ).

Justice Saunders took the oath of office to become the third CCJ president last Wednesday, July 4, during a ceremony in Jamaica, which coincided with the 39th CARICOM Heads of Government meeting.

As a fellow Vincentian and legal professional, I was overcome with feelings of excitement and admiration when I read media reports of various CARICOM leaders endorsing Justice Saunders’ promotion. Many described him as a man of integrity with a long and distinguished legal career. It was also reported that Justice Saunders’ predecessor and former colleague, Sir Dennis Byron, echoed similar sentiments and expressed great confidence in the new president’s ability to fulfil his role.

During his address, the new CCJ president bemoaned the slow pace at which CARICOM member states have signed on to the appellate jurisdiction of the court. I am also quite disappointed with the delay by many member states in their endorsement of the CCJ as their final appeal court. To date, only Barbados, Belize, Dominica and Guyana have made this important move.

Advertisement 21

Replacing the English Judicial Committee of the Privy Council with the CCJ can only augur well for CARICOM. Our laws will be interpreted by jurists who have first-hand knowledge and an in depth understanding of our region and its people. Further, there will be uniformity in the interpretation and application of our laws which would go a long way in the development of a Caribbean jurisprudence.

Notwithstanding the obvious benefits to be derived from having the CCJ as the final court for all CARICOM member states, some regional governments seem to lack the political will and others lack the ability to convince their electorate that the CCJ is the way to go.

Over the years there have been numerous calls from several quarters for Caribbean territories to commit to deeper relations. Quite recently, newly elected prime minister of Barbados the Honourable Mia Mottley called on her regional counterparts to stop paying lip service to the CARICOM Single Market and Economy and do their part in breaking down the barriers to enhanced regional integration.

As a region, we cannot continue to rest on our laurels and expect that we will achieve the level of integration necessary for greater competitiveness and a more influential voice on the global stage. The time to act is now! The time has come for regional governments to move with haste to facilitate an environment that permits regional institutions such as the CCJ to serve and legitimise our new order.

*Alicia A. Dells is an Attorney-at-Law practising in Barbados. Miss Dells has also been admitted to practise as a Barrister and Solicitor in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

The views expressed herein are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the opinions or editorial position of iWitness News. Opinion pieces can be submitted to [email protected].

The opinions presented in this content belong to the author and may not necessarily reflect the perspectives or editorial stance of iWitness News. Opinion pieces can be submitted to [email protected].

2 replies on “CCJ — towards greater C’bean integration”

  1. C. ben-David says:

    The people of SVG rejected the CCJ in the 2009 referendum for at least five reasons:

    1. A reluctance to sever the only substantial tie left with Great Britain whose Privy Council of law lords was the only state institution in which the people had any trust based on the impartiality of their past rulings.

    2. A well-founded fear that Caribbean justice — a system based on the deliberations of lawyers of questionable integrity who managed to obtain judicial status — is biased against ordinary people.

    3. The people were fooled into voting for independence from Great Britain in 1979 based on the false promise made by the political and intellectual elite that this would transform our country into a better place to live with a better way of life, a decision that the mass of people would now reverse if they had the chance party because they see that those British colonies that have chosen to maintain their status are far better off today in every possible way than we are.

    4. No one is questioning the independence, competence, or authority of the Privy Council law lords. If the current system is working well, why should it be discarded for a system with so many questionable features.

    5. It is well recognized that the people shouting the loudest for abolition of the Privy Council as our final court of appeal are the biggest cheerleaders for two other foreign courts: the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice, both in the Netherlands and both established by the hegemonic United Nations. Talk about hypocrisy.

    The people of SVG will not easily be fooled again by self-serving or inferiorizing pleas to abolish our only avenue for obtaining fair, learned, and impartial justice.

  2. Elma Gabriel says:

    This appointment is a clear verdict of the results of a man who has since childhood exemplified the characteristics of an upright man.
    My quote to the Honourable Mr. Justice Adrian Saunders: – Integrity is the light within the pathway of a good person.>>>> Incessant Blessings as you continue Walking ‘GOOD’ my SVG/Caribbean brother!

Comments closed.