Politics

NDP outlines approach to relationship with China

Leader of the Opposition Godwin Friday said that a New Democratic Party administration will manage its planned relationship with China in such a way that it redounds to the long term benefit of St. Vincent and the Grenadines (SVG).

Friday, who is also president of the NDP, recently led a party delegation to China where they held discussions, two years after announcing that the NDP no longer recognises Taiwan as a country independent of China.

At a press conference on Wednesday, iWitness News pointed out to Friday that a concern among some persons is the claim China has a tendency to exploit its relationships with smaller countries such as SVG or resource-rich countries such as those in Africa.

iWitness News further noted that it has been claimed that in some instances, Chinese workers would even construct a China-financed project in the recipient country.

Friday was asked what he would say to convince Vincentians that this would not be the case were the NDP to come to office and give effect to the One-China Policy.

The opposition leader said:

“In each circumstance, you have to balance and say what is beneficial to you. Is it the immediate jobs — if you say that is the situation, I am acknowledging that it is — or having the project eventually functioning on behalf of the people later on.”

He said a government has to consider, on a case-by-case basis, its position with respect to each investment or project.

“It is hard to say generally, other than articulating the principle that whatever we do, we want it to benefit our people, first and foremost. To say how you are going to approach any particular project depends on the nature of the project.”

Friday said that some projects are so crucial “that you are willing to trade certain things that you may not be – it is like giving concessions to certain developers, for example.

“You want to have this particular project; you might be more generous in concessions to attract them. So you have to look to each on its individual basis. So, I will reiterate what I said, which is: whatever relationship we enter, whatever project — I will go as far down as projects that we institute — that you have to start with the question, how is it benefitting our people and if you can’t understand that positively you don’t do it until you can.”

The other members of Friday’s delegation were former party and opposition leader, Arnhim Eustace, who is also Member of Parliament for East Kingstown, Member of Parliament for the Northern Grenadines, Terrance Ollivierre, and the NDP’s candidate in Central Leeward in the last elections, Benjamin “Ben” Exeter.

Friday said:

“We have stated the policy that has been adopted by the party and we remain consistent with that and we did have discussions with officials in both Beijing and in Shanghai with respect to articulating that position.”

But two years after the NDP announced the policy shift, there is still public interaction between NDP parliamentarians and Taiwan diplomats in Kingstown.

Nigel “Nature” Stephenson, who is Member of Parliament for South Leeward, attended the Taiwan National Day celebration in Kingstown in October.

Last year, NDP founder and former prime minister, Sir James Mitchell, attended the event, but told attendees that on the China-Taiwan issue, SVG should seek bankable assurances.

Some observers interpreted Sir James comment to suggest a foreign policy for sale.

Generally, the one-China Policy manifests itself in such a way that people who support Beijing, at the level of Parliamentarians, do not accept invitations to events hosted by Taipei officials.

Friday was asked to give some clarity on the actions of opposition MPs like Stephenson.

Friday said that the NDP is a party in opposition.

“We have state-to-state relations [with Taiwan], and, as a member of the opposition, that may have been the reason why he attended, but, generally speaking, we need to engage in activities that are consistent with the recognition of the One-China Policy. But, our position is that as a party in opposition, we don’t determine what is the nature of the state-to-state relations.

“We would have heard me say that when we engage in the activities that we undertook when we went on the trip, that we had party-to party-relations, we had people-to-people relations and we took the view that before you can have state-to state-relations that it is not premature for persons to engage in those sorts of exploratory and beneficial relationships. So that is how we are approaching it.”

It was noted that the Unity Labour Party administration has said that the relationship with Taiwan is based on principle.

Asked what informs the NDP’s relationship with China, Friday said:

“Well, what is the principle that they are talking about? I don’t know what is their principle. There are many principles, some are laudable and some are not. The point is that we have 178 countries in the world that accept the One-China Policy. This is something that is not some sort of far-out position. It is the United Nations’ position, so that is a principle that most countries in the world accept.”

Comments (4)

  1. Don’t worry about Friday and the Ndp, they will be forever in opposition. Worry not about their policies, they are bankrupt with respect to having an international agenda.

  2. Doctor Friday has clearly demonstrated a sense of ingratitude towards Taiwan. Is this a desperate bid for power or a representation of the New Democratic Party (NDP) base? I am very appalled that after decades of support from Taiwan the NDP would take such a position. Further, our historical ties with Japan who is seen as adversary by China would lead some to think that we are traitors particularly because Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has had considerable support from Japan over the years.

    In the not to distant future China would own a significant portion of the Western Hemisphere and Africa particularly because of incompetent Governments who fail to harness the potential of their people and adopt an innovative approach towards the development of their respective countries

    We often argue that all humans are created equal (which I do believe). Why then, do African and Caribbean countries not able to innovate in the same manner as Europeans or Asians? The answer is, we do not recognize our true worth to the world, we do not support each other, we do not accept development as a gradual process and we do not like to work excessively hard in the midst of failure.

    The only real solution to development in Africa and the Caribbean is to recognize the true potential of our people, educate them, utilize our natural resources by adding value and by adopting smart and responsible governance. Not by selling out our country and asking the world to symapthize on us and not by electing Government that is rife with corruption.

  3. Friday should pay close attention to China’s behavior in Africa, how they manipulate the leaders,and the masses of the people don’t benefit,,,,,,

    • On the other hand, Taiwan connection is stagnated for years in Svg,, this is a country that’s highly develop with technology and other industry,,,it’s time Taiwan, start to work ant help us develop along those areas,,we need serious development in our young people’s future.
      NOT hand outs,,, teach us your skill and development if u really want to help.

Comment here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.