Advertisement 87
Advertisement 211
Carlos James 1

SVG’s Tourism, Sustainable Development and Culture Minister, Carlos James, addressing COP 26.

Advertisement 219

GLASGOW, Scotland (CMC) — St. Vincent and the Grenadines Tuesday questioned how long will aspirational declarations and diplomatic manoeuvring delay the concrete actions to ensure that the planet remains less that 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrialisation levels.

The nation’s Tourism, Sustainable Development and Culture Minister, Carlos James, addressing the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP 26) here, also questioned how long developed countries would acknowledge that insufficient funding for adaptation measures results in catastrophic loss and damage to small island developing states (SIDS).

 “St. Vincent and the Grenadines therefore calls for urgent action to avert this climate crisis. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Synthesis Report clearly indicates that current nationally determined contributions (NDCs) are woefully inadequate.

“They will not bridge the gap between existing commitments and the 1.5 C pathway. We must accelerate the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in this decisive decade, to achieve net zero by 2050,” James said.

He told the conference that this past year has been the most challenging period in SVG’ post-colonial history.

Advertisement 21

“We continue to grapple with the challenges precipitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the devastation caused by the eruption of the La Soufriere volcano, and severe floods and landslides due to more extreme weather phenomena. These challenges underscore our intrinsic vulnerabilities and threaten our very existence.”

James warned that the failure to take the necessary steps required to avert this climate crisis is not only morally wrong but is intellectually dishonest.

“We strongly condemn the reckless endangerment of the 72 million people living in Small Island Developing States. To compromise on the required targets and measures is a death sentence for our people.”

He said that at the national level SVG has prioritised adaptation and mitigation actions.

“My country continues to do its part on the local front in our global fight against climate change including, inter alia, ongoing work on hydropower plants, a solar farm at the international airport and increasing the resilience of our water infrastructure as an archipelagic state.

“Further, on the international level, we seek for comprehensive solutions as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council.

“With all our best efforts, however, we cannot do it alone. New and additional finance, technology transfer and capacity building support are required to ensure we can fully implement the Paris Agreement.”

James said that as a result, SVG welcomes the efforts of those developed countries that have signalled their intention to scale up finance pledges,  and is urging others to move swiftly to deliver on the outstanding US$100 billion per annum commitment.

“We call for definitive progress on tracking the delivery of these promised funds, as well as the establishment of a New Collective Quantified Goal on climate finance by 2023. Additionally, ensuring access to grant- based funding for mitigation and, particularly, adaptation actions in small island developing states is critically important.”

James said that it is a fallacy to think that a global crisis, like climate change can be tackled without every country fully committing to this cause.

He said that this fight requires the inclusive action and meaningful participation of everyone.

“We commend Taiwan’s efforts to legislate climate targets and they should be at the table for these discussions.

“The world is watching. COP 26 must be remembered for completing the Paris Rule book and ensuring the full and effective implementation of the Paris Agreement. Anything less will be deemed a failure. We cannot afford to squander decades of hard work. The stakes are too high and time is running out,” James added.

4 replies on “SVG questions ‘aspirational’ declarations regarding climate change”

  1. Urban Alexander says:

    Carlos James you got to be kidding. For a small
    island state auch as svg the wanton destruction of the natural resources by the government is appealing. So for Carlos to go before the climate conference behaving in the most pompous of ways would not change anything much here. The hypocritical speech while it may sound good to the ears kf those who don’t know svg the people in svg are awe when what he said in that speech is the norm in svg and Carlos government is guilty of destroying svg for all to see.What a difference one (1) vote can do eh? Ignorance on display to the world.

  2. life is too short, so very soon the lying tongues will cease from speaking, the wicked and evil will cease their troubling.

  3. A FAR CRY FROM MIA’s. People, please take a moment to fact-check his presentation. Why did he not disclose how, despite the objections of our people over many years it is still the policy of his Government to continuously pollute the atmosphere and contribute to global warming by discarding and burning piles of vehicle tyres at Rabacca, leaving SVG carbon foot-print and often blanketing the Georgetown residents with deadly carcinogenic smoke?
    Yes, hypocritical indeed. James was sent there with the well referred “Red Begging Bowl”, looking for “grant-based funding” and propping up the efforts of Taiwan, his boss’ cash-cow, to be considered for a place at the conference. The objective was so transparent! I wonder who wrote that speech anyway? Your guess is as good a mine. It surely reads like ‘You know who’ wrote it.

  4. How hypocritical of world leaders to use uncountable, huge amounts of petrofuels to fly to Scotland for photo-ops, meet-and-greets, self-congratulatory speeches, condemnations, and back-slapping publicity, while telling the rest of us mere peasants to eliminate use of carbon-based energy in our daily lives. If they were there only to chat and plan, they could have done so via teleconferences. Ditto Greta Thunberg. Did any of them take sailboats or row across oceans and seas to travel so far? Nope! Did they bicycle to Glasgow? Nope! A few boasted of using electric-powered vehicles but don’t bother to inform us the carbon footprint for manufacturing all parts of such devices. Glass houses and stones is an idiom that applies perfectly to them.

Comments are closed.