The views expressed herein are those of the writer and do not represent the opinions or editorial position of I-Witness News. Opinion pieces can be submitted to [email protected]
There is an agenda in the world to push Sodomite (gay/homosexual/lesbian/transvestite/bisexual/intersex) behaviour upon the world. It is cloaked in arguments on rights and freedom from discrimination and claims that heterosexuals suffer from homophobia. It has resulted in the passage of hate crime laws and wrongful branding of speech which is critical of the sodomite behaviour as “hate speech”. There is pressure from the United Nations and other agencies on the Caribbean countries whose laws still criminalize buggery to repeal such laws, claiming we are backward for retaining such laws.
The reality is that this is all a part of the sodomite agenda. The reality is this — sodomites sodomize each other already in privacy. No law has stopped them from doing it nor stops them from what they do anyway in their private places. So what exactly do they want from the law? They want the rest of us whose consciences cannot bring us to smile upon their unnatural ways, who criticize their perverted behaviour showing them how God hates it, to accept their behaviour as natural and the norm.
This is why wherever in the world sodomy has been legalized (marriage etc.), Christians and other conscientious persons have been denied their freedom of belief through denial of their freedom of expression. In the USA, Christians have been arrested for peaceful preaching and protesting against sodomy on street sidewalks. They have been fined and ordered by judges to bake cakes for sodomite wedding (just because the baker refused to bake the cake asserting that he is a Christian and does not support such unions as they are unbiblical). Christians’ businesses have been shut down (in the UK) because they would not sell a room to a sodomite couple — a room in their own home, which they have turned into a bed and breakfast establishment. Oh yes! Then they speak of equal rights? Be not deceived, so called rights for the sodomite means no rights for the Christian and or conscientious rest of us.
We heard of the plight of Dr. Brendan Bain, distinguished medical practitioner and university professor who was fired last week by the UWI Mona Campus in Jamaica after sodomite lobbyist groups called for him to be removed, following his expert report given in a constitutional court case in Belize. In short, Dr. Bain gave reasons why he believes that even male-male sex in private have negative impacts publicly. He highlighted the nature of the sexual activities reported and confessed among men who have sex with men (MSM) and submitted journal articles which link such sex to the prevalence of STDS and HIV/AIDS among sodomites more than any other grouping. The professor’s report also highlighted statistics from studies done in Jamaica, Belize and other places such as France. Among the things he said are these:
“I am persuaded that as a physician and Public Health practitioner, one of my responsibilities is to assess behaviours for their impact on health and wellbeing. When something is beneficial, such as exercise, good nutrition, or adequate sleep, it is my duty to recommend it. Likewise, when something is harmful, such as smoking, overeating, alcohol or drug abuse, and unsafe sexual behaviour it is my duty to discourage it. Another of my responsibilities as a Public Health practitioner is to assess the cost of behaviour, not just to the individual ‘actor’, but also to the community. There are some private behaviours, either carried out by individuals or between consenting adults, that may either be helpful or of little adverse consequence to other persons in the community. Behaviours that are helpful to individuals and to the community are to be encouraged, while those that are of little adverse consequence are best left alone. On the other hand, there are instances in which private behaviours result in considerable public cost in finances due to illness, with accompanying loss of productivity and social disruption and the prospect of premature death. The public cost of these private behaviours must be acknowledged and actively reckoned with.”
Furthermore, Dr. Bain highlighted the nature of the sex had among sodomites and their link to diseases. I apologize if this upsets you:
“The male-male physical sexual repertoire may begin in a similar way to the male-female process and can progress from kissing and fondling to placement of the fingers or hand into the anal passage (fisting), oro-anal contact (called ‘rimming’ or ‘analingus’), and insertion of the penis into the anus. A variety of other actions have been reported in some cases of male-male sexual contact; these include the insertion of foreign objects into the anal passage, mouth-anal contact, and golden showers (urination on another person). In a small proportion of reported cases, there is scat (defecation on another person) and in a few cases, felching (sucking or eating semen out of someone’s anus).
“Several of the behaviours described in the preceding paragraphs are unsafe and therefore unhealthy because they create an unacceptable level of risk of acquiring and spreading infectious diseases that compromise the health, and in some instances the life of the infected person and the person’s partners. As an example, a 1981 paper by R. R. Willcox of St. Mary’s Hospital, London entitled, ‘Sexual behaviour and sexually transmitted disease patterns in male homosexuals’ published in the British Journal of Venereology, states in part that
“Mouth-anal contact is the reason for the relatively high incidence of diseases caused by bowel pathogens in male homosexuals. Trauma [during penis-anus penetration] may encourage the entry of microorganisms and thus lead to primary syphilitic lesions occurring in the anogenital area. Similarly, granuloma inguinale, condylomata acuminata, and amoebiasis may be spread from the bowel of the passive homosexual contact. In addition … trauma may be caused by foreign bodies, including stimulators of various kinds, penile adornments, and prostheses.” (Source: Claim No. 668 of 2010-In the Supreme Court of Belize A.D. 2012)
For speaking the truth Professor Bain was unjustly fired. For speaking these truths and Bible truths against sodomite perverted behaviour some press do not want to publish your writings. For preaching God’s hatred for the acts of sodomy you are accused of hatred. Yet it is the truth and the truth stands. Shame on the UWI for such cowardice in bowing to the agenda of the sodomites against truth! In my next article learn of the sodomite agenda from their own mouths. May SVG never give in to this wickedness.
Anesia O. Baptiste
The views expressed herein are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the opinions or editorial position of iWitness News. Opinion pieces can be submitted to [email protected].