Advertisement 87
Advertisement 211
In many parts of Dominica, Hurricane Maria razed the greenery, including agricultural cultivation, from the hillside of the mountainous island. (Photo: Kenton X. Chance/IPS)
In many parts of Dominica, Hurricane Maria razed the greenery, including agricultural cultivation, from the hillside of the mountainous island. (Photo: Kenton X. Chance/IPS)
Advertisement 219

By Kenton X. Chance

BRIDGETOWN, Barbados (IPS) — If there is one lesson that Dominican Reginald Austrie has learnt from the devastation Hurricane Maria brought to his country last September, it is the need for “resilience, resilience, resilience”.

And it is not just because he is his country’s minister of agriculture.

When the category 5 hurricane made landfall in Dominica, Austrie, then the country’s minister of housing, was weeks away from harvest time at his two-acre farm where he had 800 plantain trees, in addition to yams.

“So, personally, I suffered some loss. But to me, my agriculture, while it is commercial, it’s not really my livelihood,” he told IPS on the sidelines of the 15th Caribbean Week of Agriculture (CWA), the premier agriculture event in the 15-member Caribbean Community (CARICOM), which is taking place in Barbados from Oct. 8 to 12.

Advertisement 271

“I experienced it, I saw it and I know how much it cost me; that I can never recover the cost of production and so I understand what the regular and ordinary farmer is going through, fully dependent on agriculture,” Austrie, who became minister of agriculture three months ago, said of the monster hurricane.

In addition to the destruction of his plantain trees, Hurricane Maria left several landslides on Austrie’s farm when it tore across Dominica, leaving an estimated US$157 million in damage to the agriculture and fisheries sectors, and total loss and damage amounting to 225 per cent of the nation’s GDP.

Austrie is taking steps to reduce the impact of future cyclones, which forecasters say will become more frequent and intense as a result of climate change.

“So now I had to look at terracing, I had to look at the plants I can grow between the terraces to hold up the soil and I have to really look at whether I want to continue doing plantains, whether I want to expand,” he told IPS.

Climate resilience in agriculture and fisheries was a feature at CWA.

The event opened on the day that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said, in its latest report, that limiting global warming to 1.5 degree Celsius above pre-industrialisation levels would require “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society”.

As part of their advocacy for a legally-binding global climate accord, small island developing states (SIDS) like those in the Caribbean, have been using the mantra “1.5 to stay alive”.

SIDS say capping global temperature rise at 2°C above pre-industrialisation levels — as some developed countries have suggested — would have a catastrophic impact on SIDS.

The IPCC’s latest report says limiting global warming to 1.5°C, compared to 2°C, could go hand in hand with ensuring a more sustainable and equitable society.

“One of the key messages that come out very strongly from this report is that we are already seeing the consequences of 1°C of global warming through more extreme weather, rising sea levels and diminishing Arctic sea ice, among other changes,” said Panmao Zhai, co-chair of IPCC Working Group I.

In an address to delegates at CWA, secretary-general of CARICOM, Irwin LaRocque said the IPCC report supports the findings of Caribbean climate scientists “which showed that we will attain the 1.5°C warmer world much sooner than anticipated — by 2030”.

LaRocque said such a situation will result in much harsher climatic conditions for the Caribbean.

“Worse, the current trend of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, would lead to warming in the range of three degrees centigrade by the end of the century.”

CARICOM continues to advocate for greater ambition in the reduction of greenhouse gases, but must prepare for the worst, he said.

“We, therefore, need to upscale our planning for adapting to that reality,” LaRocque said, even as he noted that the IPCC report corroborates Caribbean scientists’ projections that even a 1.5 degree rise would result in significant impacts on fresh water and agricultural yields.

Further, such a level of warming would cause extreme temperatures, increases in frequency, intensity, and/or amount of heavy precipitation, and an increase in intensity or frequency of droughts.

“To counter that threat, we have been working on a programme along with our international development partners, to improve the resilience of the agriculture sector,” he said.

LaRocque pointed out that CARICOM’s agricultural research agency has been developing climate smart agriculture technologies suitable for agriculture in the region.

“CARDI has recommended identification, storage, sharing and utilisation of climate-ready germplasm of important food crops as one of the best mechanisms for building climate resilience that safeguards food and nutrition security.”

Meanwhile, CARICOM’s newest head of government, Prime Minister of Barbados, Mia Mottley, reminded delegates at the event that in September she told the United Nations General Assembly that the CARICOM region understands that it has been made dispensable “by those who believe that a 2-degree change in temperature is acceptable to the world”.

She told CWA that she did not know then that the IPCC report that came after her speech would paint such a scenario.

Mottley, who was elected to office in May, said, however, that Caribbean nationals should not have been taken by surprise.

“For us, our own scientists warned us of the ravages with respect to drought, with respect to the destruction of our reefs, and by extension, our marine life.

“They warned us, more than 10 years ago. And we have allowed others to determine our advocacy and our voice without, perhaps remembering that phrase from one of the other countries, Jamaica, that ‘We small but we tallawah (feisty)’.”

And while those calls were not headed a decade ago, Hurricane Maria and the other cyclones, including Hurricane Irma, which affected the Caribbean in 2017, have brought them home forcefully.

“One of the things we have learnt is resilience, resilience, resilience…

“Dominica is a mountainous country. We farm on the hillsides. But there are technologies that can now be used to protect your lands from moving. We have to begin using new and innovative technologies,” Austrie told IPS as he reflected on the impact of Hurricane Maria on Dominica.

“And so we believe that while Maria dealt us a blow and nobody wishes for another Maria, it taught us some lessons, which had it was not for Maria, we would have taken for granted. We had adopted a kind of complacent attitude but I believe that Maria really struck us and sent it home that we have to begin to do things differently,” Austrie said.

5 replies on “The Caribbean reiterates ‘1.5 to Stay Alive’”

  1. Planet earth is 4.543 billion years old (unless you believe in the foolishness of Bishop Ussher who calculated the birth of earth from what is written in Genesis as being 4004 BC). Since that origin there has been catastrophic climate change resulting in massive species extinction without which we humans would never have evolved (unless you believe that evolution by natural selection and mutation are agnostic myths).

    The point is that climate change is a natural and normal phenomenon, even if it is now attributed wrongly or rightly to human activity.

    Fully human beings (circa 100,000 years ago) adapted to climate change without any technological intervention — there was none available at the time and very little today — by migrating to more hospitable ennronments.

    Given that the rich governments of the world have neither the will nor the resources to stop or reverse global warming, all we can do is use the migration alternative again, at least if the rich northern countries will accept us as climate refugees a very big “if.”

    Still, the current and next generation will be long dead before catastrophe strikes and few people care about the fate of their still unborn children and grands.

  2. It is very sad that these con-artists continue to pander the “man-made, global-warming” fraud. It is a scientific fact that the climate is driven by the activity of the sun far more than anything else. It is estimated that, at present, humans contribute far less than 1% of our present climate situation. the truth is that most of the “fake” scientific community in the world are no longer talking “global Warming” Instead they say Climate Change. Why are our fake experts still calling it “Global Warming”? Didn’t they get the memo? They call it Climate Change for two reasons: 1) That name is actually an accurate title 2) Because since the year 2013 Global Temperature averages are actually falling. In other words, it is getting cooler. Droughts are more related to cooler temperatures and not rising temperatures. Hurricanes are causes by Temperature Differentials and normally NOT continued warming.
    I have a degree in Climatology. It is sad that the Caribbean is full of fraudster “scientists” that perpetrate such hoaxes to keep thier jobs and get raises of salary, at the same time encourage the leaders to raise taxes so that two sets of crooks can be happy as the people get poorer and yet still are faced with weather disasters.

    1. Dr. Watts, with all due respect, are you saying that the 175 nations that signed the Paris climate agreement are all full of it? That the melting of the Arctic ice and rising sea levels has nothing to do with increased CO2 emissions in the atmosphere? That the increasingly severe weather patterns are a function of solar activities with no bearing to how we treat our environment? Interesting. It would clarify a lot if you showed actual figures to support your arguments. We can then get a better understanding of how you came to your conclusions. I’m a creative person so I won’t argue with you on technical issues but, I do recognize patterns and trends. And, I can tell you right now that I’m favorably inclined towards our scientific community. Now, the scientific community is also saying that we are polluting the seas at an alarming rate with plastics and other non-biodegradable materials, do you doubt their integrity? Is that a hoax too? I agree with the statement about the leaders, crooks, taxes and the poor, I can relate to that.

  3. Hurricanes are a fact of life in the Caribbean, it is only natural that we learn to live with them. The effects of climate change are already evident. We have to learn to live with that too.
    We would be doing ourselves a favor by investing heavily in protecting our environment. The air quality in SVG is far cleaner than in NY.
    Alternative sources of energy like solar, thermal, hydro is much easier in the environment than fossil fuels.
    Governments should create funding-purses in case of heavy damage to important infrastructure. Like roads. So that we can be resilient, resilient, resilient.
    The smart agriculture technologies climate suitable for agriculture in the region that CARICOM’s agricultural research agency has been developing sound like a good move in the right direction. But are there plans in place to make this available to farmers and people who work on the land. I am thinking that insurance for your property is costly right now. like if you lose your entire crop. Like is said above it is really up to the governments to do the right thing and spend some of the tax money back on the people. Like from the climate tax revenues.
    (Beside how much CO2 gases did you people create at that party. LOL)

Comments closed.