Advertisement 317
Advertisement 211
marijuana law
Advertisement 219

The discussion on marijuana has heightened within the last several months and is getting much needed national attention. The government, in its effort to set conditions to enable the establishment of medical cannabis/marijuana industry, has brought three bills before the Parliament to set the legal basis for this industry.

The bills before the parliament are:

  1. Medical Cannabis Industry Bill
  2. The Permitted Use of Cannabis for Religious Purposes Bill
  3. Cannabis Cultivation Amnesty Bill

The advancement in science and technology has exposed many myths and falsehoods surrounding cannabis/marijuana. The discussion on the way forward is hindered by varying views rooted in baseless and unfounded statements regarding marijuana and its usage. Every day the world is rapidly opening up to the understanding that marijuana, a herb, it is not a narcotic but a plant with many benefits for mankind.

The NDP is fully in tune with the developments taking place worldwide and is cognisant of the history of the region and here at home with regards to the usage of marijuana as medicine and for recreation. The compelling arguments in support of marijuana as a major source of much-needed income have motivated the government to set up a full-scale marijuana industry with the intention of making tonnes of money. As a party, we believe that any attempt to create a full-scale marijuana industry must bring major benefits to local farmers, especially the traditional marijuana farmers who for decades have sacrificed a lot to keep “Vincy weed” a viable commodity.

However, we in the New Democratic Party (NDP) have come to the conclusion that the approach by the Unity Labour Party (ULP) administration to bring these bills in their present form does very little to change the status of the present marijuana growers and users in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

Advertisement 271

The cultivation of marijuana is one aspect of the cannabis industry with which Vincentians have long and valuable experience. Most cultivation of marijuana/cannabis takes place in the northwestern portion of the country on Crown lands. Almost everyone who plants marijuana is squatting on Crown lands. The crop is grown miles away in the foothills of La Soufriere mountain range away from police attention and possible thieves who usually target marijuana as easy picking if left unattended. The climatic conditions are also ideal for the growing process.

In the proposed cannabis industry bill, in order to be considered for a license to cultivate marijuana an applicant must show some form of control of the land where the marijuana will be planted. A marijuana farmer has to show ownership or leasehold or a document of some sort that will indicate that he has land legal access to the land. The bills also make provision to prohibit the planting of marijuana above certain contours so as to protect the forest reserve. In essence, after the bills are passed, marijuana farmers will not be permitted to plant where most of the marijuana is being planted now. The NDP is of the view that this is a serious issue that needs urgent attention. The land on which medical marijuana is to be planted is a matter of major concern that must be addressed.

The empowerment of the local farmers, especially the “traditional farmers”, is not promoted by the Bills. This is undermined by the draft bills. There are no provisions being made for them to be given any financial resources in this new medical marijuana regime. Notably, the proposed law does not provide for a co-operative or similar entity that will cater for the hundreds of small “traditional” farmers involved in marijuana cultivation. The traditional farmers are left on their own to face investors in terms of pricing and marketing. Each of them must negotiate price, quality and other terms of contracts essentially on his own. The pending bills have set out the way the industry will be set up and managed. It is evident that a lot of financial resources will be needed for farmers to be involved in the new industry. The present marijuana farmers do not have the means to compete, especially if left on their own without government making resources available to them to get started. It is, therefore, correct to suggest that the present bill will not benefit traditional farmers and will in fact marginalised the pioneers who have been the vanguard of the marijuana industry for many years. Partnerships between traditional farmers and investors, local or foreign, should be encouraged and every effort should be made by

Government to ensure that traditional farmers are not put at a disadvantage or short-changed.

The bills in their present form speak very little in terms of law reform. At the end of the day, a person smoking a “spliff” can be locked up. The farmer caught growing marijuana without a license will still be committing a crime. Also, anyone caught transporting marijuana will still be a crime. The bills do not in any way address these concerns. Every effort must be made to introduce law reform that will allow marijuana-related arrests, convictions and imprisonment to be removed. These are some of the major concerns that the New Democratic Party has with these bills and as a result, the party sees the need to seriously address the marijuana issue in this context.

The idea of putting measures in place to enable the setting up of a medical marijuana industry is not an original one in the Caribbean content and therefore it would be sensible to learn from the Jamaican experience. Jamaica, in drafting its legislation took note of the country’s history with cannabis. In Jamaica, the parliament was very much aware that it may not have been a good idea to pursue a strict medical industry and ignore recreational use, which had deep roots among the people. In this respect, the Government of Jamaica allowed persons to have up to two ounces of marijuana for personal/recreational use. (To be continued)

The views expressed herein are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the opinions or editorial position of iWitness News. Opinion pieces can be submitted to [email protected]

The opinions presented in this content belong to the author and may not necessarily reflect the perspectives or editorial stance of iWitness News. Opinion pieces can be submitted to [email protected].

6 replies on “Legalisation & decriminalisation of marijuana: The NDP’s position (Pt1)”

  1. One of the bills allows for the legal possession of small amounts of cannabis for personal use, contrary to the NDP’s fallacious assertion to the contrary.

    More important, the NDP seems to have bought into the unfounded and erroneous ULP view that local production of medical marijuana for the export market would make “tonnes of money” for big international producers thereby locking out the little local producers in the process. We will never have a thriving medical marijuana export industry, on the one hand, because there is already too much external competition and illegal producers will simply continue to grow and make money selling recreational weed locally and regionally, on the other.

    Indeed, no intelligent local producer would want to see the production, distribution and consumption of recreational weed totally legalized because this would soon result in a nosedive in prices.

    The more things change in little SVG, the more they stay the same.

  2. This is a bunch of nonsense from the opposition. The traditional farmers do not face the challenges of proving land ownership, and there are a lot of other falsehoods here. Just simply look at the images of parliament there are traditional farmers at every hearing shaping the law alongside the government.

  3. Vincy in New York says:

    Sometimes, when an issue is opening a political wound that is festering, it is best to remain obscure and silent as long as possible and witness the victim writhing in pain.

    “Marijuana” has become a political issue and I do not know who forced the NDP to issue a statement and put itself in a corner. Senator Bacchus-Baptiste was doing just fine being the face of the party on the issue.

    Again, I have no axe to grind with either party. The ULP came out of the starting block strong by initiating the discussion and proposing legislation. However, along the way, the party lost its way by not going far enough to enact a just bill. It also SEEMS as though there are a few people ready to cash in on medical marijuana. They do not even try to obfuscate their intentions by championing for legislation that will keep the status quo.

    Now back to NDP. Is it not that obvious the Marijuana issue has divided the nation? Is it not that obvious that the proposed bills are inadequate? What will happen is that the ULP will make it right and then it becomes a mute issue.

    I must say that, politically, Senator Bacchus-Baptiste had a great month of November. You see, whenever someone speaks and I can remember key phrases from that speech, I know that person is having an impact. The PM does just that in almost all of his speeches and responses. I can remember phrases from the PM responses on many issues from years ago. Sir James has that quality too. Senator Bacchus-Baptiste needs to stay in that zone.

Comments closed.