Casmore Fraser attempts to hide his face as he leaves the Kingstown Magistrate’s Court on Wednesday. (iWN photo)

Senior Magistrate Rickie Burnett, on Wednesday, told a 42-year-old father of three teenage children that he had embarrassed himself and his children when he stole a number of items, including a $1 slice of pudding from a Kingstown store.

“You have to stop this… You are embarrassing [your children],” Burnett told Casmore Fraser, of Sion Hill, after sentencing him at the Kingstown Magistrate’s Court.

He noted that journalists were in courtroom and would write about the man’s crime.

“Your children are going to read it. Don’t do that to them. Make this the last time that you are standing convicted for the offence of theft,” Burnett said, and urged Fraser to take his advice and turn his life around.

“You embarrass me as well. Look at what you are getting a record for,” Burnett said.

Fraser pleaded to a charge that on Wednesday, July 10, at Kingstown, he stole two Valrico Coconut Milk, value, EC$6.80, two packs of Three Jewel rice, value EC$4.64, one slice of pudding, value EC$1, and one Even Mixed Vegetable EC$4.30, total value EC$16.74, the property of Coreas Food Mart.

The facts are that on Wednesday at about 8:30 a.m., the security guard at Coreas Food Mart, acting on information from another customer, kept Fraser under close observation.
The security guard saw Fraser pick up a slice of pudding and go to the cashier.

It appeared that he paid for the pudding, and then went to the exit door, passing the guard, who stopped him and told him of her observation.

The security guard invited Fraser to the general office, where he met the manager who asked to search his bag.
The items were found inside Fraser’s bag.

Fraser told the security guard that he took the items.

The police were called in and Constable Sam reviewed the surveillance footage, which showed Fraser taking the items and putting them in his bag.

Fraser was taken to the Central Police Station, where he told police, “I take them, I don’t have any money because things rough.”

Fraser told the court he works off and on as an auto mechanic and last worked last week Thursday and was paid EC$175, which he said he used to pay rent and used some for his children, ages11, 13, and 17.

Asked to explain his behaviour, Fraser said he was sorry.

In 2015, Fraser was convicted of stealing a grass trimming line, value EC$15.

The magistrate said the man was in the habit of stealing from stores.

Burnett said the man was convicted before but said he could not look at those convictions, in keeping with the dictates of the Court of Appeal.

He, however, said he could look at the man’s record to see whether his behaviour has changed.

Fraser told the court he was going to take the items to his children.
“Well, you can’t steal to maintain your children. That’s not acceptable,” Burnett said.

He noted that Fraser pleaded guilty at the first opportunity.

Burnett said such crimes occur almost every day in Kingstown.

‘labouring under difficulties’

He asked counsel Michelle Fife and Senior Prosecutor Adolphus Delplesche, who were at the bar table but were not involved in the case, to address him on sentencing.

Fife said that, in the circumstances, she was asking for leniency, noting that the defendant is a father of three children and works intermittently.

She pointed out that he had said that the items he stole were for his children. 

The lawyer said that while the court does not want to send to the public a message that it is okay to steal, it has to be noted that the items are not luxury items, but basic food items.

“Quite often, we take the basic amenities of life, like a safe place to live, enough money to buy food, accessibility to food for granted, but there are some people who are labouring under difficulties where in which they feel compelled to do activities which are unbecoming, out of character.”

She said that while the court cannot consider the man’s previous convictions in relation to the offence, it could speak to a tendency to turn to illegal activities when he feels cornered or does not have enough.

The lawyer said that if the court is minded to impose a prison sentence, it should not be unduly long.

Fife said that she would recommend another sentence that would allow Fraser to continue to be an effective father.

In his submission, Delplesche said that sentencing in matters of that nature is always difficult.

He said the bottom line is answering the question of what does the court do with a defendant that has a record of dishonesty.
Delplesche said Fraser has a conviction that the court can consider and one that the court cannot, adding that the one the court can consider seems to suggest that theft is the man’s course of conduct.

The prosecutor said that mechanics are in demand in SVG because the country has a lot of vehicles.

“And for a grown man, a 42-year told man, to have found himself stealing a piece of pudding and items minuscule, tells me that he had a propensity for stealing,” Delplesche said, noting that Fraser received wages last week.

Burnett sentenced Fraser to three months in prison, suspended for one year.

This means that if he is convicted of an offence within the next year, he would automatically go to prison for three months, in addition to any sentence imposed for that offence.

9 replies on “Man disgraces himself by stealing $1 pudding, other items”

  1. Althian lewis says:

    Stealing is not something nice but I enter into this man feeling i quite understand his situation

  2. Darn thief, some poor uneducated Vinci especially have a propensity to steal, as a matter of fact predial larceny is crippling our economic development.

  3. Samantha Cumberbatch James says:

    This saddens me. If he had stolen a phone or something of that sort, I would feel no pity for him. However, the items that he stole show that he really had a need. I am in no way saying that it is right to steal once you have a need, but sometimes people’s situation gets so dim. And because he already has a weakness for stealing, he did it. He needs to seek help for that habit.

  4. Give a thought to this Caribbean elite Jack warner and contrast Fraser with Jack Warner!

    Jack Warner, 76, former Caribbean soccer official was “accused of embezzling tens of millions from CONCAF. He is also allegedly took a $10 million bribe to influence world cup host voting. This said Warner was today ordered by a court in the U.S to pay $79million in damages”.
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-7233667/Ex-Caribbean-soccer-official-hit-79-million-judgment.html

    Indeed this said, the “former Caribbean soccer official fighting extradition in the FIFA bribery scandal has been ordered to pay $79 million in damages from a related U.S. lawsuit. U.S. District Judge William Kuntz ordered the default judgment against Jack Warner in the 2017 civil action accusing him of embezzling tens of millions of dollars from the Confederation of North, Central American and Caribbean Association Football. The written ruling was issued in federal court in Brooklyn on Tuesday after Warner failed to contest the claim”.

    Poor he Fraser! Yo carr run ah family on dem kinda money, so im na have no money in de pocket! Why, karse im no have no good paying jab, an no likelihood af ever getting one either in dis ya socialist an elitist driven SVG! So poor he!

  5. Rawlston Pompey says:

    COMMONSENSE APPROACH

    Prosecutors shall never be called upon by adjudicators to ‘…address the Court on sentencing’ of persons who are undefended by Counsel.

    Prosecutors, prosecute, not mitigate.

    This time commendation to Senior Prosecutor Delplesche.

    He clearly avoided the ‘…indirect invitation of the Magistrate for a suggestion or recommendation or guidance’ as to a possible punishment to be imposed on the defendant.

    The ‘…unengaged attorney,’ but invitee by the adjudicator shall also be highly commended for urging the Court to show ‘leniency’ to the defendant.

    Though contrary to law, stealing a ‘…$1.00 slice of pudding’ to feed ‘…three hungry mouths’ speaks to two things,

    (i) …Desperation; and

    (ii) ‘…Necessity knows no law.’

    Sure the Senior Magistrate may give Attorney Fife’s ‘…invited Plea in Mitigation,’ some consideration.

  6. David Wilson says:

    Stealing and all others that commit this crime should be made to hold a sign up with the words i am a thief written on it in kingstown. As part of their punishment maybe this will be a deterrent maybe some may think twice .make st Vincent and the grenadine safe again keep the good work up police officers . and all the law abiding citizens God bless.

  7. I would have paid for all the things he stole. Not making excuses for what he done. Saint Vincent hardly get any work for the citizens.Many leave school and cannot get jobs with their degrees.

  8. I agree with David Wilson and KING. Making some of these offenders do such things as hold up signs in public that mentions thier crime may be better than other sentences. The SVG Constitution says the government is to preserve Human Dignity, (which they do not), but I wonder if such a law should fully apply to CONVICTED offenders. King says things are tough so the courts should be extremely lenient with him, and the court is being lenient. Odd though that a mechanic cannot get work.

Comments are closed.