Advertisement 87
Advertisement 211
Ken Findlay

The defendant, Ken Findlay leaves the Serious Offences Court on Wednesday, Feb. 9, 2022.

Advertisement 219

Chief Magistrate Rechanne Browne will, next Wednesday, Feb. 23, hand down her decision in the case in which an omnibus driver is charged with three traffic offences in connection with the protest in Kingstown on Aug. 5, 2021.

The court reserved its decision after hearing on Wednesday the evidence of the final defence witness Adrianna King, who corroborated the account of the defendant, Ken Findlay, 34, of Belair.

The court, however, did not accept into evidence a video of the incident, which King said she had extracted from her Facebook Live broadcast of the incident.

The prosecution objected to the video over issues of identification of the disc to which King said she had written the video, which she said she had downloaded from her Facebook Live broadcast.

Findlay is charged with failure to remove his vehicle, obstructing traffic, and failing to give his name to a police officer.

Advertisement 271

When he took the stand at the Serious Offences Court on Feb. 9, Findlay said that on Aug. 5, 2022, omnibuses from Belair drove together into Kingstown and joined the protest.

He said that there were about 15 vans, which made one or two laps around the city with the protesters.

After making the laps around Kingstown, the buses were stationed in front the High Court building in one line in one lane, Findlay told the court.

He said that the vans were parked very close to each other.

“I was third in the line. I Got there about after 1 p.m.,” Findlay said, adding that he remained parked there all the time.

“Police officers were there and plenty protesters,” he said.

“When the incident happened with the prime minister, they say someone pelt and struck the prime minister and the police them start to get on. I was in my van sit down, me and me girlfriend, Odette John.”

Findlay said that the windows of his van were up and the air condition was running. 

“I noticed Colin John with couple other police by the vans in front. When I look I see he coming down,” Findlay said, adding that he knew the police chief before.

“He attend plenty outing with me in Belair right below where I’m living, all in Top Belair. I don’t know if he grow up in Belair, I know he living there.”

Findlay said that John came by his van and started to beat down on the glass.

“I wind down my glass then he said, ‘Move this van from here.’ I say, ‘I cannot move if you not telling the vehicle from in front me or behind me.’

“Then me girlfriend said, ‘Colin John, that’s the way you speak to people?’ He send in his hand, hit me in me chest and grab my jersey and pull me.

“So I said, ‘Mr. John, what all that for. He said, ‘Yo nah hear me say move?’ He opened my door, hit me in my chest, pull my jersey and tell the rest officer who were there with him to take me around.

“Til then, he never asked me my name. Nothing. I walk go round with the police them. They put me in the cell. I was there til the next day until probably around lunch time they come for me and charged me.”

Third charge 6 months later

Findlay said he was working on Feb. 4 and was in Sion Hill driving towards Kingstown, when officers Corridon and Caesar were on their way out of town. 

“My van was full of passengers, they stopped me and told me not to pickup anybody else, they want me in the station.

“I asked them what for, what I did. They said, ‘Just follow me.’ They carry me in the station and when I came out the van, I asked him, ‘What I do? What this for?’ He said come in the station and you will know.  They put me in a room to sit down and tell me to wait and then he read it out for me and then tell me go by my way,” Findlay said, referring to a charge that he failed to give police his name on Aug. 5.

Road already blocked off

During cross examination by Sergeant 444 Jones, Findlay said that he did not know where omnibuses are to park in Kingstown when they are no operating.

He said that when operating the omnibus, he is supposed to stop at bus stops and the bus terminal.

He did not agree that most buses park at the bus terminal when they are not operating, but said that he had seen buses parked there when they are not operating.

Findlay agreed with the prosecutor that where he stopped and parked his vehicle on the day in question was in the public road.

He said that the vehicles behind him were not able to move forward by much. “We were parked very close.”

Findlay said that his van was not broken down on that day.

“What was your intention when you parked your van on the street?” Jones asked.

“I was in the protest.”

He denied parking the van in the area to cause an obstruction to the traffic.

“The reason the vehicle was parked there is because the road was already blocked off. They had already diverted the traffic. I don’t know who blocked off the road but cones were there for the protesters.

“When we were done making the lap around town, we drive through the cone and go and park there. If the traffic was flowing freely, if it wasn’t blocked off, I wouldn’t go and park there.”

Findlay disagreed that police had to divert traffic from around town because of where he parked his van.

“No, the traffic was already diverted,” the defendant said.

Findlay said that a driver known at Knuckle was parked infant of him at the time.

“When he (police chief) got to me, they were looking for Knuckle. Knuckle was not at the van. I don’t know when Knuckle move. I been done get locked up.”

“Can you say whether he was located?” the prosecutor asked.

“At the time I got locked up, I know he didn’t get located because his van was still there.”

Jones asked Findlay who gave him permission to drive though the cone. He said nobody.

During re-examination, Findlay said that he could not remember how many police officers were present when he through the cone, but the officers were lined up along the protesters.

“Did the police stop you?” his lawyer asked.

“No. Nobody stopped us,” Findlay responded.

“When you said you all drive through the cones, you mean the line of vans, right?” Bacchus Baptiste asked, and Findlay answered in the affirmative.

“And your van was not in front?” she asked.

“My van was third,” the defendant responded.

Advertisement 128

5 replies on “Court to rule on protest traffic charges against van man”

  1. What are they afraid of by objecting to the video? This is a bad president. This tyrant commissioner will leave his lesson soon. Once a cop twice a civilian

  2. This looks very wrong. […] COP pulled the driver out of the vehicle before placing him under arrest. with unbecoming behaviour like that anywhere else in the world there would be Hell to pay. The crackdown continues in ernest.

  3. Justice should be equal and fair to all people and not the priviledge few. I am saddened each time I read and see Vincentians going to jail for long period of time for minor issues compared to the well to do whose cases are exonerated especially if they have connections to the ruling party. People should be treated fairly no matter their party affiliation. I am all for punishment that fits the crime but make sure that justice is fair and equal and not only works to the special class.
    We are in the 21st century folks and the justice system in st Vincent has to be just.

  4. The man did not walk into nobody yard wiih a weapon and shoot him In his foot, beat him until he stool on himself. why the police commissioner did not go and questioned those two people and treat them the same way that was done to that van driver? justice has 2 faces in this face , but thank God He only has one for allll of us, wicked evil people.. Karma will remember all of you, its only a matter of time.

  5. Regardless of all your comments you have to remember the whole police forces is under the control and instruction of R……………… As such the do as they are told they cannot make their own decisions. I am starting to wonder about the magistrates.

Comments are closed.