Advertisement 87
Advertisement 323
Educator and social commentator, Philbert John. (IWN file photo)
Educator and social commentator, Philbert John. (IWN file photo)

A long-standing member of the St. Vincent and the Grenadines Teachers’ Union is calling on his colleagues to put their political sympathies aside and support the union in its bid to secure for teachers one month’s salary in lieu of salary increases since 2011.

Philbert “P-John” John, deputy principal of Central Leeward Secondary School, told a meeting of the union in Kingstown on Wednesday that the political climate that has emerged in the country over the last 15 years is one where people think of political implications before the trade union.

“But history has shown us when it comes to the union we should forget about our party. Because when our party is in opposition, they will support and embrace everything that we do. When our party gets into government, we are dealing with a different animal. We, as teachers and educators, must understand that,” John said in his contribution to the discussion.

The Teachers’ Union, along with the Public Service Union, has been spearheading efforts to get the government to pay them one month’s salary, tax-free in lieu of the salary increase.

The National Workers Movement, and the Commercial, Technical and Allied Workers Union also support the proposal.

Advertisement 21

John told the teachers that they should support the party of their choice, but noted that when it comes to bread and butter issues, political parties see country rather than union and have other priorities.

He urged every member to support the executive in pursuing the one-month salary.

“In my view it is more than reasonable, in my view it is not enough,” he said to applause.

John said he has started to write an article about the implications of living four to five years with the same salary while all other expenses are increasing.

“There is not even an adjustment for the cost of living,” he said, adding that teachers are going into a fifth year without any adjustments.

“We have been asked and we have willingly sacrificed and borne the burden of the fiscal and economic challenge that the country is facing.

“How many of us have asked ourselves for how long can we continue to make that sacrifice. How many of us have asked ourselves would the workers, the teachers and civil servants be the only one to make sacrifice? Should we bear a larger percentage of the burden? That is what we have been called upon to do,” John said.

Teachers at the meeting on Wednesday. (IWN photo)
Teachers at the meeting on Wednesday. (IWN photo)

He said that other things are happening and other expenses being met in the country.

“… but there is no effort to relieve the situation with workers, going into five years,” he said to more applause.

“And it is not about whether you support the ULP or the ULP. It is about whether or not you want to do well for your family.”

John noted that some persons argue that things are difficult all around.

He, however, used the case of how teachers in Jamaica and that country’s government responded to a salary increase proposal.


John said Jamaica is under an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme.

“Every move the Minister of Finance makes in Jamaica must have the blessing of the IMF,” John said, adding that the IMF has a tendency to demand that governments suppress wages.

“But even as the IMF is watching Jamaica, Jamaican civil servants made demands for increase and the government did not say no. They offered what the civil servants and teachers in Jamaica considered to be not enough. And then there were negotiations. And my last information suggests and at a recent convention of the Jamaica teachers Association, they agreed to accept what the government was offering.

“Despite the challenges, despite the fact that the IMF is monitoring their situation on a daily basis. Is the IMF monitoring St. Vincent on a daily basis? Are we that badly off that we are in the hand of the IMF? Absolutely not! Absolutely not!

“We are constantly being told that the government cannot afford and being called to a meeting where the last thing on the agenda is salary increase, but other items are discussed extensively. … There is nothing much discussed, there is no figures given to them about the government’s fiscal situation, there are no projections being made,” John said.

He noted that the 2015 Budget includes monies for 50 positions in the security services.

“No one discussed with us the financial implication of that,” he said, adding that that was more of a priority than giving teachers a 1 or 2 per cent salary increase.

“I am urging you to support the executive in tis quest for this kind of relief,” John said, adding that it will take “nothing much from the government. It is one-off.

“For some of us, it might mean the last car payment and then it done. For some of us, it might just make us make our second to last mortgage payment and then we are right back in the same position,” John said.

He said the Government is not saying they can’t pay the one-month salary tax-free, but they are not saying they can give it with tax.

“… they are not saying anything. They are simply saying 25 million dollars? We can’t afford that. And no matter what permutations the executive comes up with, they the still reject it. But we have to demand it. We have to demand it…

“What the union is asking for has no benefit on your retirement benefits. And what each of us should be doing now is making sure that we retire in the best situation possible. Every year we go without a salary increase is a dollar less on our pension and gratuity and I want people to understand that.

“Four years, five years, that is by how much your eventual pension and gratuity will be reduced. … and instead of receiving a pension of $1,200 a month, you may end up receiving a pension of $1,100, $1,000 a month because you are retiring at a salary that is at a certain level.”

John said he understands that the union doesn’t want to appear as if it is making too many demands on the government.

“That is why I say what the union is asking for is more than reasonable. In fact, it is not enough. That is why the government should positively consider making the one-month payment,” he said.

The meeting, which heard other presentations, including from Curtis King, principal of St. Vincent Grammar School, mandated the leadership of the union to demand that the government makes the one-month salary payment.

3 replies on “Teachers urged to put their union before their political parties”

  1. I believe it is reasonable too.In one of the PM,s recent speeches he said that he has 400 million dollars to spend and should be reelected to spend it so how come he can,t use a little of that to pay the hard working people of this country whom he claims he loves so much?He is just taking the teachers for granted because he knows that they are so politically divided so their industrial actions would not be fully supported.Rosa Parks was just one person.I hope the unions stick to their decision and back it up with actions.If the ULP teachers do not cooperate well so be it.Just do what it takes to get Gonsalves to respect you all for once.

    1. Luther Bonadie says:


      How dear you talk about Rosa Parks , That woman has build up a nation, and in the meantime enable awarness.
      You have not done one S***T for this land other run off your darm mouth.

  2. Judging from the sparse attendance shown in the photo, if this was a meeting of all union members, there is more than widespread apathy and indifference among the rank and file, most of whom would never put their Union above their Party.

    Judging from the poor skills and learning outcomes of their students, these teachers are already overpaid.

Comments closed.